[3. Director’s report to the Planning & Zoning Commission on actions taken by the City Council at the August 18, 2022, meeting]
[00:00:08]
THAT BEING SAID, WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE DIRECTOR'S REPORT.
TAKEN BY THE CITY COUNCIL DURING THE AUGUST 18TH MEETING ON ITEMS THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED BY THE COMMISSION.
UM, THE COUNCIL APPROVED THE SULLIVAN TREKS ZONING CASE.
UM, THAT WAS THE ONE THAT WAS, UH, LOCATED OFF OF BAGHDAD ROAD AND TURN MY PAGE.
UM, THEY ALSO APPROVED THE CYPRESS MEADOWS CONCEPT PLAN AND THE SO DALLAS MINOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.
I, NUMBER FOUR IS THE REVIEW OF THE MEETING PROTOCOL.
IF YOU WILL LOOK ON THE, UH, WALL, THE SCREEN ON THE WALL, IT WILL SHOW YOU HOW WE RUN OUR MEETINGS.
I REMEMBER FIVE HIS ASSISTANTS, COMMENTS, AND HE SAYS, I'M WISHING TO SPEAK ON.
WE'LL BE ALLOWED THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK AT THIS TIME.
IS ANYONE WILLING TO SPEAK, WISHING TO SPEAK, SEEING NO POSTERS AND COMMENTS? WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA IS
[ CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION]
ITEM 6, 7, 8, AND NINE.HI, A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER LANTRIP.
SECOND SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MAY ALL IN FAVOR OPPOSED CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY ITEM 10,
[10. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider action regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-002 to amend the current zoning of Interim Single-Family Rural to adopt the Creeks Edge PUD (Planned Unit Development) with the base zoning district of SFT-2-A (Single-Family Townhouse) and LO-2-A (Local Office) on one parcel of land approximately 9.977 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Williamson Central Appraisal District Parcel R332409; and more commonly known as 14751 Ronald W Reagan Blvd, Leander, Williamson County, Texas. Discuss and consider action regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-002 as described above. Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation Open Public Hearing Close Public Hearing Discussion Consider Action]
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ACTION REGARDING ZONING CASE 22 DASH Z DASH 0 0 2.TO AMEND THE CURRENT JONNY OF INTERIM SINGLE FAMILY, RURAL TO ADOPT THE CREEK'S EDGE PUD WITH A BASE ZONING DISTRICT OF S F T DASH TWO DASH A SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOUSE IN L O DASH TWO DASH A LOCAL OFFICE ON ONE PARCEL OF LAND, APPROXIMATELY 9.977 ACRES PLUS OR MINUS IN SIZE.
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY WILLIAMSON COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT PARCEL ARE 3 3, 2, 4 0 9 AND MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 14, 7 51.
RONALD W. REAGAN BOULEVARD, LEANDRA WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS STAFF PRESENTATION OF MR. HUN.
GOOD EVENING COMMISSION JUSTIN HUNT WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
THIS IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE ZONING PROCESS.
THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATED ZONING DISTRICT OF THEIR PROPERTY IN ORDER TO DEVELOP THE MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING LOCAL OFFICE AND TOWNHOUSES.
THE 1.23 ACRE TRACK THAT FRONTS RONALD REAGAN BOULEVARD IS PROPOSED FOR LOCAL OFFICE USES WITH THE REMAINDER PARCEL DEVELOPED A 72 TOWNHOUSE UNITS.
THIS PROJECT IS SITUATED BETWEEN TWO MULTIFAMILY PROJECTS, LANDER JUNCTION APARTMENTS TO THE NORTH END LINUX HILLS TOWNHOUSES TO THE SOUTH.
THIS DEVELOPMENT WAS PREVIOUSLY PART OF THE BLOCK HOUSE CREEK PUD THAT CONTEMPLATED A CONDO REGIME, RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
THE ZONING APPROVAL WAS TIED TO A CLOSING DATE FOR THE PROPERTY AND IT EXPIRED.
HIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH OF JOURNEY PARKWAY IN WEST OF RONALD W. REAGAN BOULEVARD.
THE LANDER PROPERTY IS LOCATED.
UM, THE LEANDER PROPERTY IS LOCATED NEXT TO, UH, LEANDER JUNCTION AND MULTI-FAMILY SUBDIVISION THAT WAS ORIGINALLY UNDER THE BLOCK HOUSE CROSSING PUD 13 DASH 0 7 1 DASH ZERO ZERO AND EXPIRED TO THE EAST IS LOCATED, UH, A DETENTION POND OWNED BY THE CITY OF LEANDER.
WESTWARD ARE THE CITY LIMITS OF BUDDING CEDAR PARK.
SOUTH OF THE PROPERTY IS AN UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY UNDER THE BLOCK HOUSE TOWNHOMES TOWNHOUSES PUD 19 DASH 0 2 4 DASH ZERO ZERO AND A PLAT CURRENTLY IS UNDER REVIEW, BUT IN GENERAL, UH, THIS PROPERTY DOES CONTAIN A HUNDRED YEAR FLOOD PLAIN TOWARDS THE MIDDLE OF THE LOT.
UM, THE FRONT OF THE LOCK CONTAINS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH MINIMAL TREE COVERAGE TOWARDS THE REAR.
THE LOT IS, UH, DOMINATED BY TREE COVER.
THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY, UM, A SINGLE FAMILY.
HAS IT CURRENTLY A SINGLE FAMILY HOME THAT FRONTS RONALD W. REAGAN BOULEVARD, WHICH IS ALL WHICH ALSO HAS, WHICH IT ALSO HAS ACCESS TO A DEVELOPMENT MEETING WAS HELD WITH STAFF ON SEPTEMBER 8TH, 2021, AND NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE.
UH, IN ADDITION TO THE NOTICE MELT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET, THE AGENT REACHED OUT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS OF PROPERTIES ZONED AS SINGLE FAMILY OR ANY PROPERTIES USED AS SINGLE FAMILY USES WITHIN 500 FEET AS PER ARTICLE, EXCUSE ME, 10 SECTION THREE D OF THE COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE.
[00:05:03]
UM, ANY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION LOCATED WITHIN 500 WERE ALSO CONTACTED AND NO CONCERNS HAVE BEEN BROUGHT UP.I'VE ALSO HANDED AN UPDATE TO Y'ALL ON THE NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH.
UM, AND Y'ALL SHOULD ALL HAVE ONE.
IF Y'ALL DON'T I HAVE AN EXTRA ONE, IF YOU NEED IT.
THIS REQUEST INTENDS TO PROVIDE FLEXIBILITY FOR PLACEMENT OF BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION OF PRIVATE STREETS TO PRESERVE THE NATURAL WATERWAY, PROTECT THE STEEPER SLOPE AREAS AND PRESERVE AS MANY OF THE SIGNIFICANT TREES AS POSSIBLE.
BUILDING SETBACKS WILL BE REDUCED SLIGHTLY AND LIMIT THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT TO LIMIT THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT WITH REDUCED SETBACKS ALONG THE INTERIOR PRIVATE STREET BUILDING MATERIALS WILL BE IDENTIFIED TO ASSURE A COHESIVE AND UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT STYLE.
THIS PUTT ALLOWS FOR A SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT MIXED WITH COMMERCIAL USES.
MULTIPLE TOWNHOUSES WILL BE PERMITTED ON A SINGLE LOT.
AND THE PUD ALSO INCLUDES A LIST OF PROHIBITED USES.
THE REQUEST INCLUDES ALLOWING THE PRIVATE DRIVES TO ADDRESS PERIMETER, UH, PERIMETER BLOCK LENGTH REQUIREMENTS, AS WELL AS SOME ENHANCED LANDSCAPING PROVISIONS.
THAT REQUIRES THE COMMERCIAL IS BUILT BEFORE OR CONCURRENTLY WITH RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS ARE INCLUDED IN EXHIBIT A OF THE PUD.
THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR THIS CASE.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS I'LL BE AVAILABLE AND THE APPLICANT ALSO HAS A PRESENTATION.
WE WILL HAVE THE APPLICANT PRESENTATION YEAH.
SO THE BIG ONE RIGHT HERE IS OVER AND THEN YOU CAN IDENTIFY, OH, LOOK IT THERE.
I DON'T THINK I'LL NEED TO DO ANY OF THAT.
MY NAME IS RICHARD MATTHIAS AND I REPRESENT THE OWNER AND DEVELOPER OF THE PROPERTY BEFORE YOU TONIGHT, THE PROPOSED CREEK'S EDGE PROJECT CONSISTS OF 10 ACRES OF LAND IN FRONTING RONALD W. REAGAN BOULEVARD.
THERE'S A HIGH DENSITY APARTMENT COMPLEX.
OOPS, I DIDN'T, I DIDN'T GIVE YOU THAT.
HIGH DENSITY APARTMENT COMPLEX IS JOINING THE SITE TO THE NORTH, A MAJOR ARTERIAL HIGHWAY TO THE EAST, A RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION TO THE WEST AND THE PROPOSED LENOX HILL TOWNHOME PROJECT ADJOINS THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH.
SO NOW WE'LL SHOW YOU THAT NEARLY FOUR ACRES OF THE PROPERTY IS, IS WITHIN THE MIXED USE CORRIDOR DISTRICT.
AND THE REMAINING SIX ACRES IS WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AS RECOMMENDED IN THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE ACREAGE WITHIN THE MUCC 60% WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A LOCAL OFFICE USE.
AND THE REST WILL BE DEVELOPED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE REMAINING ACREAGE OUTSIDE OF THE END, UC AS A RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE COMMUNITY, THESE LAND USES ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE COLORED AREAS ARE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE MUCC JUST FOR REFERENCE.
THE YELLOW IS THE 60% OFFICE COMPONENT AND THE RED IS THE TOWNHOMES COMPONENT.
THAT'LL BE ENJOINED WITH THE UNCOLORED AREA, IF YOU WILL, FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE PROPERTY OUTSIDE OF THE END OF YOUR SEAT, THE PROPO, UM, THE, THE PROPOSED LAND USE, NOPE, THE PROPOSED LAND USE IS A GOOD TRANSITION BETWEEN THE HIGHER INTENSITY DEVELOPMENTAL LONG RONALD REAGAN BOULEVARD AND THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS TO THE WESTERN SOUTH.
THE PUD WILL ALLOW A CONDOMINIUM PROJECT WITH PRIVATE STREETS AND AN ORGANIZED HOA FOR CONSISTENT MAINTENANCE OF ALL BUILDINGS AND OPEN SPACE.
THE PROJECT IS SUPERIOR TO THE STANDARD ZONING BY PROVIDING INCREASED MASONRY CONSTRUCTION AND INCREASE IN LANDSCAPING ALONG THE HIGHWAY BY 150%, A LIMIT OF THREE UNITS PER BUILDING RATHER THAN EIGHT MINIMUM UNIT SIZES OF 1000 SQUARE FEET VERSUS THE MINIMUM OF 700
[00:10:01]
SQUARE FEET.A MAXIMUM OF 72 UNITS IMPROVEMENTS TO THE BLOCKHOUSE CREEK, UM, GREENBELT TO INCLUDE PUBLIC PEDESTRIAN TRAIL, UM, DECORATIVE METAL FENCING ALONG THE GREENBELT AREA, UH, FULLY ENCLOSED ATTACHED, TWO CAR GARAGES AND TYPE A ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS.
WE'LL ALSO WORK WITH THE CITY STAFF TO EMPLOY AS MUCH ZEROSCAPE LANDSCAPING AS THEY WILL ALLOW TO HELP MINIMIZE THE WATER CONSUMPTION.
THE, A QUICK RENDERING CONCEPTUAL THE DEVELOPER OF THIS PROJECT IS COMPLETING A SEMINAR COMMUNITY IN CEDAR PARK.
THIS IS THE CURRENT PROJECT THAT THEY'RE WORKING ON TO GIVE YOU A SENSE, AN IDEA.
THIS IS THE MUCC CORRIDOR SHOWING THAT LAND USES WE'RE PROPOSING OR CONSISTENT WITH THE MASTER PLAN AND WITHIN THE MIXED USE CORRIDOR OR DISTRICT IN SUMMARY, THIS APPLICATION COMPLIES WITH THE COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, YOUR FAVORABLE RECOMMENDATION BE GREATLY APPRECIATED.
I'M AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE? WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND MOVE ON TO DISCUSSION.
WE'LL START WITH THE VICE CHAIR, MAN.
THIS IS IN LINE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
I DID WANT TO POINT OUT THOUGH THAT IN THE PLANNING ANALYSIS, IT STATES THAT THERE'S 1.2, THREE ACRES OF LOCAL OFFICE, WHICH IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE EXHIBIT C, WHICH TALKS ABOUT THE 2.1 ACRES AND ALSO THE, THE PRESENTATION THAT THE APPLICANT.
SO, YOU KNOW, IF ANYONE'S JUST LOOKING AT THE FRONT PAGE, IT'S ACTUALLY MORE ACREAGE THAT THEY'RE GOING TO PUT ON THE LOCAL OFFICE, ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANT AND ACCORDING TO EXHIBIT C, THAT'S IT.
COMMISSIONER MAY ONLY QUESTION I HAD WAS ON THE ENTRY AND EXIT IS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.
WITH JUST ONE STREET LIKE THAT.
I THINK THEY HAD A REQUIREMENT FOR SPRINKLING THE BUILDINGS AND THAT THAT'S AN OPTION THAT THEY'RE ALLOWED TO USE.
I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT'S ALL.
SO I HAD ALSO CONCERNS ABOUT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND THE ACCESS, AND I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH ANY OF THIS, BUT IS NUMBER EIGHT ON THAT LAST PAGE OF THE PUD DOCUMENT IS THAT SUFFICIENT LANGUAGE SO THAT IF FIRE WANTS THEM TO SPRINKLER RATHER THAN SO THEY HAD THE OPTION OF EITHER TO EXCESS POINTS OR SPRINKLING.
I HAD ONE QUESTION ABOUT THE, THE FUTURE USE STREET THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO GO THROUGH THERE.
THEN WE'LL NO LONGER GO THROUGH.
IS THERE A REPUBLIC TRAILS THAT'S STRAIGHT YET? THERE STILL NEEDS TO BE A TRANSPORTATION PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THAT.
AND I THINK THAT'S IN PROCESS WITH THE CITY.
VISIT VARIED SUICIDE COMPLETED, UM, FOR THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH AND SOUTH.
THIS WAS KIND OF A MISSING PIECE.
UH, OTHER THAN THAT, I THINK IT'S A GREAT USE OF THE PROPERTY.
SO NO OTHER CONCERNS AND I HAVE NO QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS.
I'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION, A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER LANCH IT SECOND BY VICE CHAIRMAN.
ALL IN FAVOR OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY
[11. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider action regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-005 to amend the current zoning of Interim SFR-1-B (Single-Family Rural) to adopt the 675 Kauffman Loop PUD (Planning Unit Development) with the base zoning districts of SFT-2-A (Single-Family Townhouse) and GC-2-A (General Commercial) on two parcels of land approximately 24.91 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Williamson Central Appraisal District Parcels R328207 and R555049; and more commonly known as 675 Kauffman Loop, Leander, Williamson County, Texas. Discuss and consider action regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-005 as described above. Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation Open Public Hearing Close Public Hearing Discussion Consider Action]
ITEM, NUMBER 11, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ASHLYN REGARDING ZONING CASE 22 DASH ZERO DASH 0 0 5.TO AMEND THE CURRENT ZONING OF INTERIM SFR.
ONE DAY, THE SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TWO ADOPTED 6 75 KAUFMAN LUTH PUD WITH A BASE OF HIS DISTRICT OF S F DASH TWO DASH EIGHT, SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOUSE AND GC DASH TWO DASH A GENERAL COMMERCIAL ON TWO PARCELS OF LAND, APPROXIMATELY 24.91 ACRES PLUS OR MINUS IN SIZE.
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY WILLIAMSON COUNTY.
CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT IS PARCELS ARE 32 82 0 7 OR 55, 0 OR 55, 5 0 4, 9, AND MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 6 75 KAUFMAN LEANDER, TEXAS.
THIS IS THE FIRST STEP OF THE ZONING PROCESS.
THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATED ZONING OF THEIR PROPERTY FROM INTERIM SINGLE FAMILY, RURAL TO A PUD WITH SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOUSE IN GENERAL COMMERCIAL AS THE BASE ZONING DISTRICTS, THIS REQUEST INCLUDES A VARIETY OF COMMERCIAL
[00:15:01]
DEVELOPMENT ALONG THE FRONTAGE OF STATE HIGHWAY 29, A SPALL LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE PROPERTY IN 130 TOWNHOUSES, A TOWNHOUSE, A HOUSE UNITS ON THE REMAINING 15.6 ACRES OF THE PROPERTY ADJACENT TO COFFMAN LOOP.THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY LOCATED IN THE ETJ AND REQUIRES ANNEXATION PER DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
THE RESOLUTION FOR THE ASSOCIATED ANNEXATION CASE 22 DASH EIGHT DASH 0 0 1 WAS APPROVED ON 8 18 20 22.
THE ZONING IS DEPENDENT ON THE APPROVAL OF THIS ANNEXATION.
THIS PROPOSAL MEETS THE INTENT OF THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY OF ACTIVITY CENTER AND DOES NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWED PERCENTAGE OF 30% RESIDENTIAL.
WE HAVE INCLUDED AN EXHIBIT SHOWING THE LAND USE PERCENTAGES, INCLUDING THE PROPOSED USES FOR THIS ACTIVITY CENTER IN YOUR PACKETS.
THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED TO THE EAST OF HEB AND TO THE NORTH OF LARGE LOT SINGLE FAMILY.
THE ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE EAST IS LOCATED IN THE ETJ AND IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED UNDEVELOPED.
THE TO THE NORTH IS STATE HIGHWAY 29.
THESE PROPERTIES ARE LIGHTLY COVERED IN TREES AND OPEN LAND WITH A LARGER, WITH THE LARGER PARCEL BEING UNDEVELOPED LAND AND THE SMART, UH, SMALLER PARCEL CURRENTLY AS A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE.
THIS PROPERTY HAS FRONTAGE ADJACENT TO STATE HIGHWAY 29 AND KAUFMAN LOOP, AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO EXTEND THE SIDEWALKS OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ALONG THE ROADWAY.
FRONTAGE IS A DEVELOPMENT MEETING WAS HELD WITH STAFF ON MAY 5TH, 2021 TO BUILD 160 TOWNHOUSE HOMES.
GENERAL COMMERCIAL ASPECTS HAVE BEEN ADDED TO HELP MEET THE ACTIVITY CENTERS INTENT ALONG WITH REDUCING THE NUMBER OF TOWNHOUSES TO 130.
IN ADDITION TO THE NOTICE MELT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET, THE AGENT HAS REACHED OUT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY ZONED AS SINGLE FAMILY AND ANY PROPERTIES USED AS SINGLE FAMILY USES WITHIN 500 FEET AS PER ARTICLE 10, SECTION THREE D OF THE COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE.
ANY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS LOCATED WITHIN THE 500 FEET WERE ALSO CONTACTED AND NO CONCERNS HAVE BEEN BROUGHT UP.
UH, THE FULL REPORT IS INCLUDED IN THE PACKETS.
THIS PUD PROPOSAL MEETS THE INTENT FOR THE FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY OF ACTIVITY CENTER AND DOES NOT EXCEED THE MAX ALLOWED PERCENTAGE OF 30% RESIDENTIAL.
THE PUTT NOTES GO OVER SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND ALSO ALLOWED AND PROHIBITED USES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT IT'S PUT ALLOWS FOR SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENT MIXED WITH COMMERCIAL USES.
MULTIPLE TOWNHOUSES WILL BE PERMITTED ON A SINGLE LOT.
AND THE PUTT ALSO INCLUDES A LIST OF PROHIBITED USES.
PHASING IS PROVIDED THAT REQUIRES THAT COMMERCIAL IS BUILT BEFORE OR CONCURRENTLY WITH THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
ADDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS ARE INCLUDED WITH EXHIBIT A IN THE NOTES AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE FOR THIS CASE.
I'LL BE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE.
IF Y'ALL HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, AS SOON AS DEFINITELY I HAVE A PRESENTATION, NO PRESENTATION, NO.
I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING FAMILY WISHES TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM, SEEING NONE WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE'LL ENTER INTO DISCUSSION.
WE'LL START WITH COMMISSIONER CARPENTER THIS TIME.
THE ONLY QUESTION I HAD WAS IS THIS GOING TO HAVE ACCESS OUT ON THE HIGHWAY 29? CORRECT.
UH, THE COMMERCIAL PORTION OF IT WILL.
THERE WILL, THEY HAVE TO ADJUST A TURNING LANE AND ALL THAT WITH TXDOT REQUIREMENTS ON THERE.
COMMISSIONER TRIP, YOU HAVE QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER MALLS.
NOW QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER MAY.
WELL, I LOOKED IN THE PACKET FOR THE PERCENTAGES.
WHAT WERE THE ACTUAL PERCENTAGES FOR THIS AND THE, UM, ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT.
SO A LOT OF THE PERCENTAGES ARE GOING TO BE LISTED RIGHT HERE AND IT'S GOING TO BE COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL, AND THEN OKAY.
I WAS JUST CONCERNED ABOUT THE OVERALL ACTIVITY CENTER THERE AND WHAT, UH, THE MORE RESIDENTIAL WE PUT IN, THE MORE DIFFICULT IT IS TO FIT THE COMMERCIAL IN THERE.
AND WE HAVE A FULL MEETING HALL OF PEOPLE.
WHY ARE THEY PUTTING COMMERCIAL NEXT TO MY, UH, NEW HOME? THAT'S ALL VICE-CHAIRMAN.
SO THAT WAS GOING TO BE MY, MY STATEMENT TOO, IS THAT, YOU KNOW, WE'RE AT 20,
[00:20:01]
IT DOES THE PERCENTAGES ON THAT CHART INCLUDE THIS DEVELOPMENT, IS THAT WHERE YOU'RE AT AS A TOTAL? RIGHT? SO THAT MEANS WE'RE A LITTLE, SLIGHTLY OVER 28%.SO DOES THIS MEAN THAT WE'RE NOT GONNA ALLOW ABOUT TWO MORE PERCENT OF RESIDENTIAL IN THE ENTIRE ACTIVITY CENTER? SO I'VE BEEN ON THE RECORD BEFORE.
I'M KIND OF AGAINST THE FIRST IN, FIRST OUT, BUT WE ALSO DON'T WANT TO PUNISH DEVELOPERS EITHER.
SO IT'S KIND OF THAT BALANCE OF HOW DO WE, HOW DO WE DO THE RIGHT THING FOR THE CITY? HOW DO WE DO THE RIGHT THING FOR THE DEVELOPER IN MEETING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? SO THAT'S A FIGHT THAT YOU GUYS WILL HAVE TO MAKE WITH DEVELOPERS WANTING TO DEVELOP THE REST OF THE LAND.
UM, THE ONLY ISSUE I HAD WITH THE ENTIRE THING WAS THE TYPO ON THE PROHIBITED USES.
IT'S NOT A MAYOR EQUIPMENT SALES.
I'M SURE THAT THE MAYOR IS NOT DOING ANY.
WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION, A MOTION TO APPROVE BOTH NEW APPROVED BY THE VICE CHAIR.
OPPOSED MOTION IS APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY.
A GENTLEMEN, WE STAND ADJOURNED AT 7 22.