Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript


[00:00:02]

GOOD EVENING, LADIES

[1. Call to Order.]

AND GENTLEMEN, WELCOME TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING OF THE CITY OF LEANDER FOR SEPTEMBER 22ND, 2022.

THE TIME IS SEVEN.

O'CLOCK LET THE RECORD

[2. Roll Call.]

SHOW THAT ALL COMMISSIONERS ARE PRESENT, WHICH BRINGS US

[3. Director’s report to the Planning & Zoning Commission on actions taken by the City Council at the September 15, 2022, meeting.]

TO ITEM NUMBER THREE ON OUR AGENDA.

OUR DIRECTOR'S REPORT DIRECTOR GRIFFIN.

UM, GOOD EVENING.

I'M REPORTING ON ACTION TAKEN BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

DURING THE SEPTEMBER 15TH MEETING, THE CITY COUNCIL COMPLETED THE SECOND READING OF THE ENCLAVE AT CRYSTAL FALLS, PLAIN UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND THEY APPROVED THE REQUEST.

UM, THEY DID HAVE A LETTER AGREEMENT ON THE AGENDA THAT RELATED TO THE LEANDER TRUCKING FOOD TRUCK PARK.

UM, THEY HAD SOME SUPPLY CHAIN ISSUES AND, UM, WE'RE ALLOWING THEM TO HAVE A PORTA POTTY AS A TEMPORARY, UM, CONDITION UNTIL THEY'RE ABLE TO GET A FULL BLOWN ADA RESTROOM ON THE SITE THAT WASN'T SOMETHING Y'ALL PRESENTED TO 'EM, BUT IT RELATES TO A, A CASE THAT YOU RECENTLY HEARD.

UM, THEY HELD THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE CREEK'S EDGE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND THE REQUEST, AND THEY HELD THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR 6 75 COFFMAN LOOP, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND THEY ALSO APPROVED THAT REQUEST.

AND THAT'S IT FOR MY REPORT.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

IF YOU ALL

[4. Review of meeting protocol.]

REFER TO THE, THE FAR WALL, YOU WILL, UH, BE ABLE TO LOOK AT HOW WE RUN OUR MEETINGS.

OUR MEETING PROTOCOL, UH, ITEM FIVE IS CITIZEN'S COMMENTS.

AT THIS POINT IN TIME, WE WILL ENTERTAIN ANY CITIZEN WISHING TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM, NOT ON THE AGENDA, SAMUEL WISH TO SPEAK THAT BEING SAID, WE WILL MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.

[ CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION]

PLEASE NOTE ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, UH, COMMISSION THAT WE ARE MOVING ITEM SEVEN, WE ARE PULLING ITEM SEVEN FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA AND MOVING IT TO THE REGULAR AGENDA.

THAT BEING SAID, DO I HAVE A MOTION ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE MOTION BY COMMISSIONER HAMPTON.

SECOND, SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARPENTER, ALL IN FAVOR OPPOSED CARRIE UNANIMOUSLY.

WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER NINE,

[9. Conduct a Public Hearing regarding Special Use Case 22-SU-002 to allow for the temporary residential use of a travel trailer or recreational vehicle for use by owners while building permanent home on site; on one parcel of land approximately 4.72 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Travis Central Appraisal District Parcel 513800; and more commonly known as 13201 Vista Rock Drive, Leander, Travis County, Texas. Discuss and consider action regarding Special Use Permit Case 22-SU-002 as described above. Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation Open Public Hearing Close Public Hearing Discussion Consider Action]

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING SPECIAL USE CASE 22 DASH U DASH ZERO TWO TO ALLOW FOR THE TEMPORARY RESIDENTIAL USE OF A TRAVEL TRAILER OR RECREATIONAL VEHICLE FOR USE BY OWNERS WHILE BUILDING PERMANENT HOME ON SITE ON ONE PARCEL OF LAND, APPROXIMATELY 4.72 ACRES PLUS OR MINUS IN SIZE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY TRAVIS CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT IS PARCEL 5, 1 38 AND MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1 32 1 VISTA ROCK DRIVE.

LANDR TRAVIS COUNTY, TEXAS STAFF PRESENTATION.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.

SO THIS REQUEST IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT PROCESS.

THE APPLICANT, UH, HERE TONIGHT AND IS REQUESTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PER, UH, COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE.

UH, LET'S SEE, I'M SORRY.

FOUR SECTION TWO 13 TO ALLOW A TEMPORARY RESIDENTIAL USE OF AN RV UNTIL PERMANENT HOME IS BUILT ON SITE.

THE APPLICANT IS CURRENTLY WORKING, UH, WITH STAFF TO SUBMIT THEIR RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT.

UH, THEY'RE WORKING WITH MR. JUSTIN HUNT ON THAT.

UM, SO SOME SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS, UH, THAT SECTION THAT I, UH, PLACED IN YOUR REPORT IS PER THE, UH, COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE.

THERE'S SOME CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT WHICH WAS COVERED IN, UH, THE LETTER.

UH, WE'LL GO TO THE SITE INFORMATION.

SO LET'S SEE.

WELL, I'LL JUST OUTLINE IT.

SO, UH, TO THE NORTH IS A POD, WHICH IS THE, UH, TRUVISO SUBDIVISION IT'S, UH, ZONE RESIDENTIAL, UH, BASED OWNING RESIDENTIAL TO THE EAST IS UNDEVELOPED.

THAT IS ALSO PART OF THE TRUVISO SUBDIVISION.

IT IS UNDEVELOPED TO THE SOUTH, UM, IS INTERIM, UH, SFR ONE B, AND THAT IS ALSO UNDEVELOPED TO THE WEST IS INTERIM SFR, ONE B AS WELL.

AND THAT IS A RESIDENTIAL LOT.

UH, THE PROPERTY IS BOUND TO THE NORTH AND EAST BY THE TRUVISO SUBDIVISION TO THE SOUTH ACROSS VISTA ROCK DRIVE IS APPROXIMATELY 20 ACRES OF LAND.

UH, THAT IS UNDEVELOPED, UH, AND TO THE WEST IS A LARGE RESIDENTIAL LOT.

THE PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN A FLOOD PLANE AND CONTAINS HEAVY TREE COVER.

AND IS UNDEVELOPED CURRENTLY THE PROPERTY TAKES ACCESS OFF OF VISTA ROCK DRIVE.

THIS TRACK HAS BEEN PLANTED AS PART OF THE TOWN OF LEANDER, UH, FINAL PLAT THAT'S ONE THROUGH FOUR, I BELIEVE THAT'S CORRECT.

UM, THIS TRACK WILL HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH WATER AND SEWER, UH, WITH THE TRUVIO PHASE FIVE, UH, SECTION ONE SUBDIVISION AND THE IMPROVEMENTS ARE CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION.

THE PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED AGAIN.

UM, A DEVELOPMENT MEETING WAS NOT HELD, UH, TO SUBMIT THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT SUBMITTAL.

[00:05:01]

UH, PUBLIC NOTICE, UH, WAS PUBLISHED IN THE HILL COUNTRY NEWS.

UH, THE PROPERTY OWNER MAILED OUT, UH, A LITTLE FLYER, UH, AS WELL AS NOTICES WERE MAILED BY STAFF FOR, UH, THE 200 FOOT BUFFER.

UH, TONIGHT IS THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING.

UH, CITY COUNCIL WILL HAVE THEIR, UH, PUBLIC HEARING ON THE 20TH OF OCTOBER.

AND THEN THE SECOND AND FINAL READING OF THE ORDINANCE POTENTIALLY WOULD BE ON NOVEMBER 3RD.

UH, AGAIN, NOTICES WERE MAILED BY STAFF, UM, TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS THAT FELL WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE PROPERTY, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIAL USE PERMIT NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH INFORMATION WAS ATTACHED WITHIN YOUR PACKET AS ATTACHMENT NUMBER EIGHT.

THIS REQUEST REMAINS CONSISTENT WITH BOTH THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, DESIGNATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL AND CURRENT ZONING OF INTERIM SFU.

ONE B THE PROPOSED TEMPORARY RESIDENTIAL USE OF AN RV, UH, FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1321 VISTA ROCK DRIVE KEEPS THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL CHARACTER AND WOULD BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES.

PLEASE NOTE, IF THE PROPOSED RV USE IS APPROVED, A PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED.

UM, SUCH PERMIT WILL EXPIRE ONE YEAR FROM THE ISSUANCE DATE.

THE PERMIT MAY BE RENEWED ANNUALLY AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CITY COUNCIL.

UH, SO STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST.

HERE'S A COPY OF HER.

THERE WAS A CODE ENFORCEMENT CASE AS WELL ON THE PROPERTY.

SO THAT INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.

UM, HERE'S THEIR KIND OF ROUGH DRAFT OF WHAT'S GOING ON RIGHT NOW WITH THE FUTURE HOME LOCATED HERE AT THE FRONT.

IT'S AN ESTIMATE, OF COURSE THEY ARE GETTING STARTED ON THAT RIGHT NOW.

UM, THEY ALSO INCLUDED A NOTE, UH, ACKNOWLEDGING THAT THE RV PLACEMENT IS A TEMPORARY USE, UH, AND, UH, WHILE CONSTRUCTING THEIR PERMANENT RESIDENTS ON SITE.

SO, UH, STAFF IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY OF YOUR QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MR. DALE, DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT PRESENTATION? WE'RE WE'RE AN APPLICANT.

WE DO NOT HAVE A SEPARATE PRESENTATION.

WE CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS HAVE.

EXCELLENT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

ALL RIGHT.

I'LL OPEN TO PUBLIC HEARING.

DOES ANYBODY WISH TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTER DISCUSSION VICE CHAIR? I, I DON'T HAVE ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS.

I THINK IT JUST MAKES SENSE, ESPECIALLY WITH THOSE LARGE OF A LOT THAT IT IS.

UM, I DO JUST, JUST CUZ I'M A STICKLER FOR THESE THINGS.

WANNA POINT OUT THAT IT, IT DID SPEAK ABOUT NO MORE THAN TWO PEOPLE MAY OCCUPY IT AND YOU SAY YOU, YOU WOULDN'T, BUT YET IN YOUR PICTURES YOU HAVE A FAMILY PHOTO, WHICH SEEMS TO BE MORE THAN TWO PEOPLE.

SO JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT THERE IS A DISCREPANCY IN THAT NO EXPLANATION NEEDED FOR ME.

I DOESN'T CHANGE MY OPINION ABOUT IT.

I JUST WANTED TO KIND OF POINT THAT OUT FOR THE REST OF THE COMMISSION AS YOU GUYS ARE CONSIDERING, BUT I'M GOOD WITH THIS.

THANKS COMMISSION.

RUME NOTHING ON IT.

COMMISSIONER MOSS.

I'M GOOD.

NOTHING COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, JUST TO BE A LITTLE NITPICKY WHEN IT SAYS RV CABIN PLACEMENT, I DON'T THINK BUILD A CABIN EITHER, BUT UH, SHOULD WE BE JUST THE LANGUAGE ALONE IS THE ONLY THING I WANNA POINT OUT.

I BELIEVE YOU JUST PLAN ON HAVING AN RV, BUT IT JUST SAYS RV AND CABIN.

WELL, SO INTERESTING.

IT'S CALLED PLEASE.

IF YOU PLEASE COME UP AND, AND SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONE, UM, IS THIS IT'S CALLED A CABIN MODEL.

RV IS THE NAME OF IT.

IT LOOKS LIKE A LITTLE CABIN, BUT IT'S TECHNICALLY CONSIDERED AN RV, UM, FROM THE PEOPLE WE BOUGHT IT FROM.

THAT'S WHAT THEY TOLD US SO WE CAN CLARIFY THE EXHIBIT.

OKAY.

YEAH.

IT'S I DON'T THINK THAT'S A PROBLEM BASED IS THIS BASED ON THE SPUR FOOTAGE THEY SAID, IS THAT OKAY? GOOD.

IT COMMISSIONER WILL ANSWER IT.

NO QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER.

CARPENT I'M GOOD WITH THIS.

I'M GOOD AS WELL.

THIS IS AN ACTION ITEM.

WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTIONS MOTION TO APPROVE MOTION, MOTION BY COMMISSIONER LANCER.

SECOND BY VICE CHAIR, ALL IN FAVOR.

OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM

[10. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider action regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-022 to amend the current zoning of SFR-3-B (Single-Family Rural) to adopt the Moon Valley PUD (Planned Unit Development) with a base zoning district of LC-5-D (Local Commercial) on two parcels of land approximately 8.78 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Williamson Central Appraisal District Parcels R319362 and R031223; and more commonly known as 15841 Ronald W Reagan Blvd, Leander, Williamson County, Texas. Discuss and consider action regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-022 as described above. Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation Open Public Hearing Close Public Hearing Discussion Consider Action]

10, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ACTION REGARDING ZONING CASE 22 DASH Z DASH 22 TO AMEND THE CURRENT ZONING OF S F R THREE B TO ADOPT THE MOON VALLEY PUD WITH A BASE ZONING DISTRICT OF FC FIVE D ON TWO PARCELS OF LAND, APPROXIMATELY 8.78 ACRES PLUS OR MINUS IN SIZE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY WILLIAMSON COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT AS PARCELS R 3 1 9 360 2 AND R 0 3 1 2 2 3 AND MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1 5 8 4 1 RONALD W. REAGAN BOULEVARD, LEANDER WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS STAFF PRESENTATION EVENING COMMISSIONERS MICHAEL CHENOWSKI PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

UH, SO THIS REQUEST IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE ZONING PROCESS.

UM, ORIGINALLY

[00:10:01]

THE APPLICANT HADN'T COMPLETED THE NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH, UH, WITHIN THE 14 DAY, UH, TIMELINE OF THE SEPTEMBER 8TH MEETING.

UM, SO THE CITY SENT NOTICES TO ALL THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET, UH, THAT THE MEETING WOULD BE RESCHEDULED TO THE SEPTEMBER 22ND MEETING.

UH, AND THE APPLICANT HAS COMPLETED THAT NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH PRIOR TO THIS MEETING.

UM, SO THE SEPTEMBER 8TH WAS THE LAST, UH, TIME THIS WAS SEEN NO ACTION WAS TAKEN.

UM, THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATED ZONING DISTRICT OF THEIR PROPERTY IN ORDER TO OPERATE A RETAIL PLANT NURSERY.

SOME OF THE SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS, UH, FOR THIS PROPERTY, UH, THE PROPERTY WAS ORIGINALLY DEVELOPED AS THE GRASS PATCH NURSERY PRIOR TO ANNEXATION, AFTER THE PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED, THE NURSERY WAS THEN SOLD TO A CHURCH, UH, AND RELOCATED THE CHURCH HAS SINCE SOLD THE PROPERTY TO MOON VALLEY NURSERY.

UH, BUT IN ORDER TO OCCUPY THE PROPERTY AS A NURSERY, NOW THE ZONING CHANGE IS REQUIRED.

UH, THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED A WITH THE LOCAL COMMERCIAL FIVED, UH, BASE ZONING DISTRICT.

UH, THIS PUD WOULD ALLOW FOR THE NURSERY WHILE LIMITING OTHER USES, UH, THAT MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL.

ADDITIONALLY, THE TYPE FIVE SITE COMPONENT, UH, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR INDUSTRIAL OR HEAVIEST COMMERCIAL USES AND MAY BE COMBINED ONLY WITH GENERAL COMMERCIAL, HEAVY COMMERCIAL OR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USE COMPONENTS.

UH, THIS REQUEST LIMITS THE OUTDOOR STORAGE TO JUST PLANTS AND MATERIALS ASSOCIATED WITH THAT BUSINESS.

UH, THE TYPE D ARCHITECTURAL COMPONENT IS INTENDED ONLY FOR INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE, HEAVY COMMERCIAL SERVICES OR OTHER SIMILAR APP, UH, APPLICATIONS AND SHALL BE UTILIZED ONLY WITH GENERAL COMMERCIAL, HEAVY COMMERCIAL OR HEAVY INDUSTRIAL USE COMPONENTS.

UH, THIS ARCHITECTURAL COMPONENT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE UTILIZED, UH, WITH THE MAJORITY OF GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS.

AND, UH, THE COMPONENT IS NOT INTENDED FOR RETAIL OR OFFICE DEVELOPMENT OR ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS.

UH, WE'RE NOT ADEQUATELY BUFFERED FROM THOSE RESIDENTIAL USES.

THIS SITE ARCHITECTURAL COMPONENT IS ALSO DISCOURAGED ALONG MAJOR, UH, THOROUGHFARES AND IS INTENDED TO BE UTILIZED WITHIN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK DEVELOPMENT.

UM, SO SOME OF THE SURROUNDING AREAS, UH, TO THE NORTH IS ZONED, UH, SFR GENERAL COMMERCIAL, UH, THIS SFR, UH, SINGLE FAMILY, RURAL, UH, PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY THE, UH, FIRE STATION FOUR, UM, TO THE, UH, WEST.

IT IS HEAVY COMMERCIAL, UH, UNDEVELOPED, UH, TO THE SOUTH IS THE COLD SPRING SUBDIVISION AS WELL AS ANOTHER, UH, GENERAL COMMERCIAL PROPERTY.

UH, AND TO THE WEST IS RONALD REAGAN.

UM, YOU CAN'T REALLY SEE IT, BUT THERE'S A GENERAL COMMERCIAL ZONE PROPERTY OVER THERE AS WELL.

UM, THIS PROPERTY IS JUST SOUTH OF EAST CRYSTAL FALLS.

UH, THE PROPERTY WAS PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED, UH, AS MENTIONED EARLIER.

SO IT HAS EXISTING DRIVEWAYS PARKING AND BUILDINGS.

UH, SO THE RECENT NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH WAS MAILED OUT, UH, SEPTEMBER 2ND.

AND YOU CAN SEE ATTACHMENT NINE FOR MORE DETAIL.

UH, SO THIS PROPERTY FALLS UNDER THREE LAND USE CATEGORIES ON THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP, UH, THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER PRIORITY, THE MULTI-USE CORRIDOR PRIORITY AND THE NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL, UH, BECAUSE THE FUTURE LAND USE, UH, CATEGORY BOUNDARIES IS MEANT TO BE FLEXIBLE AND NOT A HARD DELINEATION.

UH, THE COMPATIBLE ZONING DISTRICTS SHOULD STILL MEET THE INTENT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, UH, FOR PROPERTIES ALONG A MAJOR CORRIDOR.

UH, THIS REQUESTED LOCAL COMMERCIAL ZONING COMPONENT IS A COMPATIBLE USE CATEGORY IN THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP.

UH, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A LESS INTENSE USE THAN WHAT COULD BE PERMITTED AT THIS LOCATION.

THE LESS INTENSE LOCAL COMMERCIAL COMPONENT INCLUDES RESTRICTED HOURS OF OPERATION, UH, WHICH WOULD NOT BE APPLICABLE IF THE PROPERTY WERE ZONED GENERAL COMMERCIAL.

UH, THE COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRES THE DEVELOPER TO PROVIDE A SIX FOOT MASONRY SCREENING WALL FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL.

IN ADDITION, THE ORDINANCE REQUIRES A 50 FOOT BUILDING SETBACK FOR ALL NEW BUILDINGS ADJACENT TO THE RESIDENTIAL ZONE PROPERTY.

THIS PUD ALSO INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING PROHIBITED USES, UH, BANK OR OTHER LENDING INSTITUTION, FUNERAL, HOME RESTAURANTS, CULTURAL FACILITIES, SUCH AS ART GALLERIES OR MUSEUMS, FOREST SHOP GROCERIES AND DRY GOODS, MEDICAL CLINICS, OR PHARMACIES.

UH, SO ONE OF THE WAIVERS, UH, THE MAIN ONE BEING REQUESTED IS THE USE OF THE TYPE FIVE AND TYPE D UH, COMPONENTS WHILE WHILE PAIRED WITH, UH, LOCAL COMMERCIAL AND ALONG A MAJOR CORRIDOR.

AND SOME OF THE HIGHER STANDARDS ARE INCREASING FRONT SETBACK, REAR AND SIDE SETBACKS BY FIVE FEET WHERE, UH, ADJACENT TWO COMMERCIAL AND A HUNDRED PERCENT MASONRY FOR ALL NEW BUILDINGS.

AND I'LL BE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

DO WE HAVE AN APPLICANT PRESENTATION? GOOD EVENING, FELLOW CHAIR AND COMMISSIONERS.

I'M JEN HENDERSON.

UM, I'M THE APPLICANT ON THIS ONE? UM, I DON'T HAVE A FORMAL PRESENTATION.

I THINK STAFF DID

[00:15:01]

A REALLY GOOD JOB WITH THEIR, THEIR PRESENTATION.

I JUST WANNA POINT OUT A COUPLE OF THINGS.

UM, WHILE WE DIDN'T SPECIFICALLY RESTRICT A MUSIC VENUE, I KNOW THAT THAT CAME UP WITH SOME COMMUNICATIONS WITH STAFF AND THIS IS NOT GONNA BE A MUSIC VENUE.

THIS IS GOING TO BE NURSERY, UM, THINK PLANTS AND TREES.

THEY, THEY WANNA SELL THESE TREES AT THIS LOCATION.

UM, SO, SO THE REASON THAT WE WENT WITH THE PUD ZONING IS BECAUSE THE WAY THE ZONING DISTRICT, THE WAY THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS WRITTEN IS REALLY A MENU STYLE TYPE OF ORDINANCE.

SO WE, WE PICKED FROM THE BIGGER MENU AND WE'D LIKE TO RESTRICT IT TO ONLY WHAT THIS TENANT WANTS TO DO.

UM, SO, SO THE REASON FOR GOING WITH TYPE FIVE IS BECAUSE OF THE, THE HEAVY STORAGE OF PLANTS OUTSIDE.

UM, WE JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT THEY, THEY WILL BE ABLE TO, TO STORE THOSE OUTSIDE WITHOUT A PROBLEM.

UM, AND THE REASON FOR THE TYPE D IS BECAUSE THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE PLANTS, WE WANNA MAKE SURE THAT ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION SHOULD THEY CHOOSE TO DO THAT.

UM, ONLY HAVE TO, IT IT'S LIMITED TO THE TWO SIDES, BUT WE'LL HAVE A HUNDRED PERCENT MASONRY ON THE BUILDING.

UM, RIGHT NOW THIS TENANT DOES NOT PLAN TO DO ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION.

THEY WANNA REUSE THE BUILDINGS AND SLABS THAT ARE THERE.

UM, THEY, THEY ARE READY TO MOVE IN, READY TO GET OPERATIONAL.

UM, AS SOON AS WE CAN GET THROUGH THIS PROCESS, UM, DON'T WANT TO CHANGE THE PARKING LOT.

DON'T WANNA CHANGE THE BUILDINGS.

UM, SO REALLY THAT'S, THAT'S IT.

WE JUST WANNA MAKE SURE THAT THIS IS ZONED CORRECTLY.

YOU SEE IT'S, IT'S GOT A COUPLE OF ZONING DISTRICTS.

WE NEED TO, TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY CAN OPERATE WITHOUT HAVING ANY KIND OF ISSUES IN THE FUTURE.

SO I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS HAVE, UM, HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY FROM THE PUBLIC AS WELL.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

WE WILL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING.

UM, I HAVE ONE PERSON SIGNS UP TO SPEAK, UH, RAY HILL.

IF, UH, YOU WILL COME UP AND STATE YOUR NAME, YOU WILL HAVE THREE MINUTES.

THERE HAVE SEVERAL OF US.

I'LL GET TO YOU IN A SEC.

I WILL GET TO THAT MR. HILL, IF YOU COME UP AND STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, WE'LL GIVE YOU THREE MINUTES.

RAY HILL 25 17 MAR SLAB LANE.

UH, MY BIGGEST THING IS WE DON'T MIND A NURSERY.

WE CAN NICE TO HAVE MORE TREES IN THE BACK.

OUR BIGGEST THING IS IF THEY SELL IN TWO YEARS, FIVE YEARS, WHAT CAN THEY PUT BACK THERE WITH THE WIDER RANGE OF ZONING? THEY CAN PUT A HEAVY COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL BACK THERE, WHICH CAN BE ALL KINDS OF NOISE.

WE THINK WE'RE NOT REALLY PRIVY TO, OR WANTING TO HAVE A OPEN VENUE IN YOU.

UH, WE BOUGHT THE HOUSE JUST TWO YEARS AGO.

WE'VE BEEN ON LEAN AND SINCE 2008, LOVE THE SOLACE AND THE PEACE AND QUIET WOULD LOVE TO KEEP IT THAT WAY.

AS WE'RE ALL OF OUR NEIGHBORS, UH, WE GOT SEVERAL PEOPLE WHO FILL OUT STUFF JUST TO GET IT HERE AND PUT IN.

I DON'T KNOW HOW WE GIVE THIS TO YOU OR WHAT, OKAY.

BUT THAT'S THE, THE CRUX OF IT IS WHEN WE BOUGHT THE HOUSE IN 2020, MY WIFE DOES DILIGENT WORK.

I WAS RAISED IN A MOBILE HOME.

ALL MY LIFE.

DIDN'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT ZONING.

I WAS USUALLY OUT IN THE COUNTRY.

SHE WAS CAME FROM FLORIDA AND SHE KNOWS ALL, WHO'S GONNA MOVE BEHIND US.

WHAT'S GONNA MOVE BEHIND US.

LIKE, WHY SHOULD WE CARE? WELL, I KNOW NOW SHE'S TAUGHT ME VERY WELL.

SO SHE WAS A BULLDOG WHEN IT CAME TO LOOKING AT THIS PLACE, UH, WE HAD FRIENDS THAT WENT TO GLAD TIS CHURCH.

WE KNEW THAT WAS GONNA GO BE BACK THERE.

ERIC CAME WITH ROSIE FOR A WHILE.

AND, UH, LIKE I SAID, IT'S BEEN NICE AND PEACEFUL.

WE'VE GOT THE WILLIAMSON KENNY DOG SHELTER, A COUPLE DOORS OVER.

IT'S KIND OF NOISEY ON SATURDAY MORNING, BUT YOU'RE KIND OF USED TO IT.

BUT THE, UH, JUST THE NEXT TO THE FIRE STATION ABOUT 200 YARDS OVER IS A, SOME KIND OF INDUSTRIAL THING.

YOU COULD HEAR IT BANGING QUITE A BIT.

SO TO BRING IT EVEN CLOSER WOULD BE DISTURBING.

I MEAN, I UNDERSTAND PROGRESS.

I UNDERSTAND CONGRESS MAKING ALL KINDS OF MONEY ON MY FORT, UH, TRULY A CONSERVATIVE, WHAT IS IT? NOT IN MY BACKYARD, TYPE OF THING.

SO THAT'S WHAT THE MOST OF US WOULD LIKE TO HAVE.

WE DON'T OBJECT TO THE, UH, NURSERY.

LIKE I SAID, I, I BOUGHT STUFF FROM MOON VALLEY DOWN ON WORLD LEAF JOHNSON USED TO BE BEFORE.

IT'S JUST A MATTER OF WHAT IF THEY SELL THE PLACE.

AND THEN IT'S OPENED THAT THE ZONING HAS TO STAY THE SAME.

SO ONE OF OUR QUESTIONS IS, DOES IT HAVE TO BE THAT ZONING OR THAT, CAN THEY CHANGE THE ZONING? WHAT DO YOU, WHAT DO Y'ALL

[00:20:01]

HAVE TO DO WITH THAT? HOW CAN YOU DO IT? SO THAT'S MY SPEAK.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

I BELIEVE WE HAVE SOME OTHER FOLKS WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM.

IF YOU WOULD COME UP TO THE MICROPHONE, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD.

AND WHEN YOU WERE DONE, IF YOU WOULD TURN A CARD INTO MS. KALE, WE WILL BE, UH, HIGHLY APPRECIATIVE STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD, PLEASE.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.

MY NAME IS KANA.

UM, I, ALONG WITH MY WIFE, WE OWN A HOUSE ON 2, 5 21 MARBLES LAB LANE.

UM, SO WE BOUGHT THIS HOUSE ABOUT SEVEN MONTHS AGO IN A PEACEFUL COMMUNITY.

UM, AND THE BACKYARD WAS A MAJOR FACTOR IN DECIDING, UH, TO, IN ORDER TO GO FORWARD WITH THIS HOUSE.

UM, SO EVERY DAY WE WAKE UP TO, YOU KNOW, VERY NICE AND PEACEFUL AND SCENIC VIEW OF THE BACKYARD.

WE TAKE A NICE WALK AND WE WOULD LIKE TO KEEP IT THAT WAY.

UM, WE ABSOLUTELY DO NOT HAVE ANY ISSUE WITH THE NURSERY AT OUR BACKYARD, BUT WE DEFINITELY DO NOT APPRECIATE, UM, A TYPE FIVE OR TYPE D LEVEL, UM, DEVELOPMENT.

UM, SO THAT COULD DISRUPT OUR PIECE, I WOULD SAY OUR VIEW.

UM, SO I UNDERSTAND THAT, UM, THE APPLICANT TALKED ABOUT, UM, THE TYPE FIVE AND TYPE D THAT THEY, WHY, WHY DO THEY NEED IN ORDER TO KEEP THE PLANTS AND STUFF? THAT'S PRETTY MUCH OKAY.

BUT THEN AS MY FELLOW NEIGHBOR MENTIONED THAT WHAT IF IN FUTURE THIS PROPERTY GETS SOLD TO SOME OTHER PERSON, AND THEN THEY WANT TO DO THINGS THAT ARE ALLOWED UNDER, UH, TYPE FIVE AND TYPE D UM, THEN WE, WE WOULD HAVE BIGGER PROBLEMS. UM, YEAH, THAT'S ALL I WANTED TO SAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

ANYONE ELSE? WISHING TO SPEAK, COME ON UP, STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS FOR THE RECORD AND YOU'LL HAVE THREE MINUTES.

THANK YOU.

I HAVE TO READ IT.

I I'M TOO EXCITED TO REMEMBER ALL MY THOUGHTS.

IF YOU DON'T MIND, IT'S FINE WITH ME.

MY NAME IS RITA FLO.

MY NAME IS RITA FLORES AND I LIVE AT 25 17 MARBLE SL LANE.

I BROUGHT THE SONG WITH MY DAUGHTER, MARIA HILL AND HER HUSBAND RAY, SO THAT I WOULD HAVE SUPPORT.

SHOULD I NEED HELP? AT MY OLD AGE, I HAVE BEEN BLESSED WITH GOOD HEALTH FOR 87 YEARS.

THE HOUSE IS IDEAL FOR THREE ADULTS, AND IT'S LOCATED IN A PEACEFUL, QUIET NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT BEFORE WE BOUGHT IT, WE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT THE VACANT LAND BEHIND US.

I AND WAY SEPARATELY CAUGHT THE CITY TO ACQUIRE WHAT WAS ITS OWN FOR AND WHAT WAS GOING TO BE BUILT.

WE WERE ASSURED THAT IT WAS ZONED, UM, RESIDENTIAL, RURAL, UM, THAT, UM, THAT BACON LAND WOULD HAVE FUTURE BUSINESS WOULD HAVE TO SERVE THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD SUCH AS A NURSERY SCHOOL DAYCARE CENTER CHURCH.

AND AT ONE POINT IT WAS, WE WERE TOLD THERE WAS A PLANNED NURSERY.

NOW MY DAUGHTER AND HER HUSBAND HAVE LIVED IN WILLIAMS COUNTY FOR 30 YEARS.

THEY ACTUALLY HAD BEEN TO THAT NURSERY BEFORE.

SO THEN WE FOUND OUT THAT THE OWNER OF THE, AT THAT TIME OF THE LAND WAS, UH, GLAD HIDINGS AND AUSTIN RAY THEN CALLED THE PASTOR AND WAS TOLD THAT THE CHURCH WAS PLANNING TO START SERVICES AND THAT LOCATION AND THE EXISTING BUILDING.

BUT EVENTUALLY WE BUILT A WORSHIP CENTER.

WE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH THAT.

AND SO WE WENT AHEAD AND BOUGHT THE HOUSE THAT WAS THREE MONTHS BEFORE COVID OUTBREAK.

AND THAT'S PROBABLY WHY THE CHURCH DIDN'T BUILD.

UM, WE WERE NEVER NOTIFIED BY THE CITY THAT THE CITY OF ORLANDO HAD PLANNED ON A NEW COMPREHENSIVE PLAN THAT WOULD GREATLY AND ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR HOME IN ITS VALUE.

WE WERE NEVER NOTIFIED, BUT IN AUGUST WE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE CITY THAT A MR. BLAKE OF LAS VEGAS, L BCC HAD BOUGHT THE PROPERTY BEHIND OUR HOME AND IS REQUESTING TO HAVE IT REZONED.

HE NEEDS THE REZONING BECAUSE HE INTENDS TO LEAVE LEADS THE PROPERTY TO MOON VALLEY NURSERIES.

I ACTUALLY HAVE A LITTLE PROBLEM WITH THE ZONING TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL, BUT GREATLY OBJECT TO THE TYPE FIVE SIDE COMPONENT AND MORE SO TO THE TYPE D ARCHITECT'S OPPONENT, BOTH OF WHICH ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS AND ARE INTENDED TO BE UTILIZED WITH AN INDUSTRIAL PARK DEVELOPMENTS AS OUTLINED IN THE CITY'S LETTER.

IF MR. BLAKE HAD INTENDED TO LEASE A PROPER A NURSERY, HE SHOULD HAVE BOUGHT PROPERTY ALREADY ZONED FOR SUCH A PURPOSE.

ONCE AN INDUSTRIAL ZONING IS ON THE BOOKS IN A PRIME LOCATION, SUCH AS OURS, I'M SURE THE PROPERTY VALUE OF THAT REZONE PROPERTY COULD EASILY DOUBLE YET.

EVERY RESIDENTIAL

[00:25:01]

HOME OWNER COULD LOSE HALF OF HIS OR HER INVESTMENT IF HE NEEDED TO SELL RIGHT NOW, GROCERY PRICES, GAS PRICES, AND WHERE TILL LEADERS ARE GOING FOR UP EVERY WEEK.

IT IS INCONCEIVABLE THAT WE ALSO WOULD LOSE MUCH VALUE IN OUR HOMES.

THE ORIGINAL CITY PLANNERS WISELY PROVIDED A GREEN BUFFER TO OUR RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.

I KNOW THAT YOU HAVE TO PROVIDE FOR GROWTH IN REVENUES TO THE CITY, BUT YOU ALSO HAVE TO ADDRESS THE NEEDS OF THE EXISTING RESIDENTS.

I RESPECTFULLY URGE YOU TO DENY THE REZONING REQUEST.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

ANYONE ELSE? WISHING TO SPEAK? COME FORWARD, MAN.

HI, I'M MARIA HILL AND I LIVE AT 2 507 MARBLE LA LANE WAS RAY AND MY MOM .

SO I BASICALLY, UM, I DIDN'T UNDERSTAND THE, THE UNDER WE'VE DONE SOME RESEARCH, SO I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED BY WHAT YOU SAID ON THAT.

THEY, THE NURSERY PURCHASE THE PROPERTY, CUZ MY UNDERSTANDING IS THE NURSERY'S GONNA LEASE THE PROPERTY FROM THE PEOPLE WHO PURCHASED IT.

AND THAT'S CONCERNING BECAUSE IF TOMORROW LET'S SAY WE SIGN ALL THIS AND AGREE TO IT.

IF ALL OF A SUDDEN THE LEASE GOES DOES NOT GO THROUGH.

THERE'S NO OBLIGATION IT THEY CAN SELL.

THEY CAN TURN INTO COMMERCIAL.

CURRENTLY WE SEE A FIRE STATION BEHIND OUR HOUSE, THE FIRE STATION'S ONE STORY.

IT'S A NICE LITTLE FIRE STATION.

UM, IT'S NOT BAD TO LOOK AT.

LIKE RAY SAID, YOU LOOK TO THE LEFT, YOU CAN SEE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.

AND THAT RIGHT BEHIND RESIDENTIAL IS NOT ATTRACTIVE.

PLUS SOME OF THE NOISE DEPENDING ON WHAT THAT COMMERCIAL WOULD BE USED.

SO I STRONGLY BASICALLY OFFICIALLY STRONGLY, STRONGLY OBJECT TO, UM, HAVING IT TO WHERE AT SOME POINT THEY COULD SELL IT AND WE COULD HAVE COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS BEHIND US.

AND I WOULD LIKE SOME CLARIFICATION ON THAT.

SO THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

IS THERE ANYONE ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK, SEEING NONE? I HAVE, UM, SOME PEOPLE WHO WOULD LIKE TO HAVE THEIR OPPOSITION READ INTO THE RECORD, MARIE KATES, AND IF I BUTCHER YOUR NAMES, I'M SO SORRY.

MANDY JAO, LAUREN MORGAN, CYNTHIA CUNNINGHAM, RAEL DEGOS JOHA JO B STROBE, JEFF SCHMIDT AND CUNNINGHAM.

I ALSO HAVE, UM, TWO PEOPLE WHO WISH TO HAVE THEIR COMMENTS READ INTO THE RECORD.

I HAVE JASON CI AEL.

I WOULD LIKE TO EXPRESS MY CONCERN WITH PROPOSED THE ONLY REQUEST AT 1 5 84, RONALD W. REAGAN BOULEVARD, ACCORDING TO THE DOCUMENTATION THAT WAS SENT OUT AND NURSERY PLANNED FOR THAT PROPERTY AS A 13 YEAR RESIDENT, WHOSE PROPERTY BACKS UP TO THEIR PROPERTY BEING DISCUSSED FOR REZONING.

I HAVE NO ISSUES WITH A NURSERY BEING BROUGHT IN AS THERE WAS A NURSERY THERE.

WHEN WE PURCHASED OUR HOME, I DO TAKE ISSUE WITH THE PROPERTY POTENTIALLY BEING REZONED TO LC FIVE D, WHICH WOULD THEN MAKE THE PROPERTY OPEN TO FUTURE BUSINESSES, SUCH AS OUTDOOR ENTERTAINMENT, VENUES, OR INDUSTRIAL WAREHOUSE, HEAVY COMMERCIAL SERVICE THAT WOULD DRAMATICALLY IMPACT THE VALUE OF OUR PROPERTY AND EVERY OTHER PROPERTY IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD.

AT THE LEAST, I WOULD ASK THAT THE ZONING COMMISSION AND OR CITY COUNCIL PUT SOME RESTRICTIONS ON WHAT CAN BE BUILT AND OPERATED ON THAT LAND OR MORE PREFERABLY KEEP IT ZONED A SINGLE FAMILY RURAL, BUT TRY TO IMPLEMENT A GRANDFATHER CLAUSE THAT WOULD ALLOW MOON VALLEY TO STILL RUN ITS NURSERY ON THOSE 8.78 ACRES.

SINCE THE NURSERY HAS OPERATED ON THAT ACREAGE BEFORE YET PREVENT ANY FUTURE BUSINESSES OR BUILDINGS THAT WOULD IMPACT HOMEOWNERS IN THE COLD SPRINGS NEIGHBORHOOD.

THEN WE HAVE EMILY KA CHUCK, THE MATERIALS THAT WERE MAILED ARE CONTRADICTORY AND CONFUSING.

THE LETTER STATES THAT THE PROPERTY WOULD BE INTENDED FOR LOCAL COMMERCIAL USE THE SITE COMPONENTS AND ARCHITECTURAL COMPONENTS ARE TYPE FIVE AND TYPE D BOTH WHICH ARE TO BE PAIRED WITH GC HC OR HI COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL.

WE CATEGORICALLY OPPOSE HEAVY COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES BEHIND OUR HOME.

WE HAVE NO DESIRE TO BE LOCATED NEXT TO AN OUTDOOR FUELING OR WASHING OF VEHICLES, OUTDOOR ENTERTAINMENT OR ANIMAL BOARDING, ALL OF WHICH ARE PERMITTED UNDER THIS DESIGNATION.

FURTHERMORE, THE DOCUMENT STATES THAT BOTH DESIGNATIONS

[00:30:01]

ARE NOT INTENDED TO BE USED ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS OR ALONG MAJOR THOROUGHFARES.

THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION IS BOTH ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY AND ALONG A, A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE.

THERE IS NOT A SUFFICIENT BUFFER BETWEEN OUR PROPERTY AND THE PROPERTY.

IN QUESTION TO WARRANT A REZONING TO A COMMERCIAL PROPERTY, THE BUFFER CONSISTS OF OUR WOODEN RESIDENTIAL FENCE AND THEIR WIRE FENCE AND A FEW FEET OF EASEMENT IN BETWEEN.

NOTHING EXISTS TO PROTECT OUR HOMES FROM NOISE AND LIGHT POLLUTION CREATED BY COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES.

THE CURRENT TRAFFIC INGESTION ON ROUTE REAGAN BOULEVARD CANNOT HANDLE ANOTHER COMMERCIAL PROPERTY WITHOUT REDESIGNING THE ENTRANCE SLASH EGRESS TURNING LANES FOR ENTERING AND MERGE LANES FOR EXITING TRAFFIC WOULD BE NEEDED BEFORE ADDING COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC TO THAT PROPERTY.

ADDITIONALLY, LARGE TRUCKS FOR HEAVY COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL USE EXITING THAT PROPERTY AND ENTERING A 65 MILE AN HOUR ROADWAY ARE LIKELY TO CAUSE UNNECESSARY COLLISIONS, GIVEN THAT THE LC DESIGNATION IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH TYPE FIVE AND TYPE D DESIGNATIONS.

WE'D LIKE TO KNOW WHAT IS PLANNED FOR THE PROPERTY.

IN QUESTION ONE WAS THE COMMERCIAL USE IS INTENDED TWO, WHAT BUILDINGS ARE PLANNED THREE, HOW MUCH PAVEMENT PARKING WILL BE ADDED FOUR.

HOW WILL TRAFFIC BE HANDLED BY WHAT PROTECTIONS FOR OUR PROPERTY ARE PLANNED? THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION.

THAT'S ALL THE COMMUNICATION I HAVE.

IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE, WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTER DISCUSSION.

I'LL BEGIN DOWN HERE WITH COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.

DO I, IF I'M READING THIS CORRECTLY, THEY'VE PROHIBITED A, A WHOLE LOT OF THE USES THAT EVERYBODY'S MENTIONING ARE N NOT CONDUCIVE TO WHAT THEY WANNA SEE.

SO THEY'RE BASICALLY, UH, THE ONLY ALLOWABLE LOOSES USES THEY'RE GONNA BE ABLE TO DO AS A NURSERY, UH, A HANDY CRAFT SALES AS PART OF THAT NURSERY AND RETAIL SALES OF NEW PRODUCT AND SERVICES, WHICH TO ME IS A LITTLE VAGUE.

WHAT IS EXACTLY DOES THAT MEAN? SO THAT'S SOMETHING IN CAREER QUEST, UM, IS MADE MORE SPECIFIC.

YEAH, BUT I MEAN, IT WOULD ALLOW FOR RETAIL SALE OF GOODS, BUT THEY'RE BASICALLY PROHIBITED BANKS, FUNERAL HOMES, ANY SORT OF ENTERTAINMENT, YOU KNOW, FOR ALL THE STUFF THAT EVERYBODY IS OBJECTING TO IS A PROHIBITED USE.

SO IF SOMEBODY CA SOLD THE PROPERTY OR THE NURSERY STOPPED BEING, THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME BACK AND REZONE THAT FOR THAT, OR THEY'D HAVE TO ASK FOR SOMETHING DIFFERENT TO BE ABLE TO DO ANYTHING ELSE ON THAT PROPERTY.

CORRECT.

OKAY.

AND THE OTHER THING DIDN'T, THEY MENTION THEY WOULD BE PUTTING IN A MASONRY FENCE ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE, IT'S REQUIRED BY OUR ORDINANCE THAT THEY, SO THERE'S GONNA BE A MASONRY FENCE SEPARATING THAT FROM THE CORRECT FROM THE REAL ESTATE.

OKAY.

THOSE ARE MY QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER.

OKAY.

I'VE GOT A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT ON THE PUT DOCUMENT, WHICH IS, UH, D ONE C WHERE THEY'RE MENTIONING RETAIL, YOU'RE MENTIONING RETAIL SALES OF NEW PRODUCT AND SERVICES.

UM, YOU KNOW, A SAYS RETAIL NURSERY, WHICH I ASSUME ALL THAT GOES WITH THAT, YOU KNOW, BAGS OF THIS AND THAT, YOU KNOW, LIKE A NORMAL NURSERY.

SO WHAT EXACTLY IS C SO C WOULD BE THE, KIND OF THE SAME AS THAT, LIKE THE POTS OR THE LITTLE PLASTIC SAUCERS OR, YOU KNOW, THE ACCESSORIES THAT SOME PEOPLE WOULD LIKE TO HAVE WITH THEIR PLANTS DECORATIVE DECORATIVE THINGS.

YEAH.

OKAY.

UM, WE COULD, UM, UPDATE IT TO, TO SAY RETAIL NURSERY AND, UM, ACCESSORY GOODS AND THEN ELIMINATE SEA.

CAUSE I THINK THAT WOULD SOLVE A LOT OF THE CONFUSION THAT PROBABLY WOULD CAUSE I THINK THAT'S CONFUSING PEOPLE.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THAT'S THE QUESTION I HAD FOR YOU.

ABSOLUTELY.

YEAH.

THANK YOU.

UM, THE, UM, YOU KNOW, THE ZONING GOES WITH THE, THE PROPERTY, NOT THE PROJECT NECESSARILY.

SO I THINK THAT WHERE THE CONFUSION IS COMING IN IS, IS THE ZONING IS LOCAL COMMERCIAL.

IT IS MEANT IT IS COMPATIBLE WITH BEING ADJACENT TO A RESIDENTIAL AREA BECAUSE THE HOURS ARE RESTRICTED.

THIS IS ACTUALLY LIKE THE STAFF WAS SAYING A LESS INTENSE USE THAN WHAT THEY COULD BE ALLOWED UNDER GENERAL COMMERCIAL.

IT'S GOING TO, YOU KNOW, OPERATE LIKE A PLANT NURSERY, UH, THE OUTSIDE STORAGE, THE PLANT THAT'S FOR THE PLANTS.

I MEAN, THEY HAVE TO BE OUTSIDE.

AND I THINK THAT'S WHERE IT'S, IT'S GETTING CONFUSING IS THE FIVE AND THE D GO WITH SOME OTHER ZONING THAT HAVE DIFFERENT USES, BUT THE ZONING IS STILL LOCAL COMMERCIAL PERIOD.

AND HAS THEY'VE GONE IN AND PROHIBITED CERTAIN USAGE, WHICH WOULDN'T BE COMPATIBLE NEXT TO NEIGHBORHOOD.

AND AGAIN, THE HOURS WOULD BE RESTRICTED.

SO IT IS MEANT TO BE COMPATIBLE AND SOMEBODY WOULD HAVE TO, IF THEY DECIDE THEY'RE NOT GOING TO DO THIS OR, OR, YOU KNOW, BACK OUT OF THE PROJECT, THEN SOMEONE HAS TO COME BACK IN FOR NEW ZONING AND GO THROUGH THIS WHOLE THING AGAIN WITH, YOU KNOW, THE PLANNING AND ZONING AND THE COUNCIL.

SO HOPE THAT CLARIFIES SOME OF IT.

THAT'S ALL I HAD

[00:35:01]

HAVE A APPROACH AND SHOW YOU THE LITTLE, WE CAN'T GO BACK.

I'M I'M SORRY, WE CAN'T.

I'M SORRY.

YOU CAN'T DO THAT.

COMMISSIONER HAMPTON.

I JUST HAVE A QUESTION FOR APPLICANT ALSO.

IS THERE, UM, SO IS THERE LIKE A LEASE AGREEMENT FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS OR IS JUST, UM, WHAT'S THE TERMS I'M SO GLAD YOU ASKED THAT QUESTION.

SO LES BLAKE IS THE OWNER OF LAS VEGAS, LLC.

THAT IS THE PROPERTY HOLDING COMPANY FOR MOON VALLEY NURSERIES, MOON VALLEY NURSERIES IS THE OPERATIONAL COMP COMPANY FOR THE, THE NURSERY.

SO THEY'RE, THEY'RE TIED TOGETHER.

UM, THEY'RE, THEY'RE KIND OF ONE AND THE SAME, BUT IT'S, IT'S THE LEGAL DOCUMENTS THAT, THAT KIND OF SEPARATE THEM.

DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? IS THERE LIKE THE NUMBER OF YEARS THAT, UH, I GUESS I WAS LOOKING FOR, IF THERE WAS LIKE A THREE YEAR AGREEMENT FOR THIS NURSERY TO BE IN PLACE, BUT THERE'S INDEFINITE AGREEMENT.

OKAY.

MM-HMM PERFECT.

UM, AND THEN AT THIS TIME, I THINK MICHAEL MENTIONED THAT YOU'RE GONNA DO A HUNDRED PERCENT MASONRY ON ALL NEW BUILDINGS, BUT DIDN'T SOUND LIKE YOU'RE GONNA DO ALL, ANY NEW BUILDINGS AT ALL.

YOU'RE GONNA KEEP EVERYTHING AS IS THAT'S CORRECT? YES.

WE DON'T WANNA DO ANY NEW CONSTRUCTION OVER THERE BESIDES THE MASONRY WALL.

WE DO WANT TO PUT THAT MASONRY WALL THERE.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

MM-HMM COMMISSIONER MOS.

HELLO EVERYBODY.

UM, I JUST WANTED TO, UM, MAKE SURE IT IS CLARIFIED THAT IF, UH, THE CURRENT, UH, PERSON WANTS TO SELL OR WHATEVER, AND SOMEBODY NEW COME IN, THEY WILL HAVE TO COME BACK TO THE BOARD TO, UH, CHANGE ANY ZONING.

RIGHT NOW.

I DON'T HAVE A ISSUE WITH THE ZONING BECAUSE OF ALL THE RESTRICTIONS, BUT IF SOMETHING ELSE IS GONNA HAPPEN NEW OR WHATEVER, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S CLEAR TO EVERYONE THAT YOU'RE GONNA HAVE TO COME BEFORE THE BOARD AGAIN.

AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY.

COMMISSIONER MAY JUST ONE QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.

UM, THIS IS RESELL ONLY, THERE'S NO LIKE MANUFACTURING WHERE THEY WOULD CREATE MULCH OR THERE THEY'RE THERE IT'S STRICTLY RETAIL, CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT.

MM-HMM , IT'S THE ONLY QUESTION I HAD VICE CHAIRMAN.

I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR YOU, JEN.

IT'S MORE FOR STAFF.

UM, SO MY, MY QUESTION GOES AROUND THE, THE INCOMPATIBILITY WITH THE, UM, TYPE FOUR AND FIVE, WELL, ACTUALLY IT WOULD BE TYPE FOUR AND FIVE COMPONENTS WOULD BE SOMEWHAT INCOMPATIBLE WITH THIS AND THE TYPE D THE RESTRICTIONS THAT ARE PLACED BECAUSE ITS OWN LOCAL COMMERCIALS SUPERSEDE WHAT IS SHOWN AS BEING ALLOWED IN THE TYPE FIVE.

I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WAS ON THE RECORD SO THAT EVERYONE UNDERSTANDS THAT.

AND THERE ARE SOME, YOU KNOW, INCONSISTENCIES IN THAT WHERE IT SAYS THE TYPE FIVE ENTERTAINMENT, VI VENUES AND ANIMAL BOARDING.

UM, BUT THAT WOULDN'T BE ALLOWED BECAUSE IT'S A LOCAL COMMERCIAL ZONE.

SO I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE WAS CLEAR OF THAT AND NOT, NOT HAVING TO WORRY ABOUT THINGS LIKE THAT.

GOING BACK TO THE, THE FAMOUS SAYING, IF IT'S SOLD, IT'S STILL LOCAL, COMMERCIALLY ZONED.

SO THEY COULDN'T JUST COME IN AND BRING IN A, UM, THAT WITH ALL THE RESTRICTED USES.

SO IT'S SOLD AS IT WOULD BE THE APPROVED ZONING WOULD BE, WHICH MEANS BASICALLY ONLY SOMEONE COULD DO A NURSERY IN THERE IF IT'S SOLD, UM, GIVEN THE WAY THAT THIS, UH, PUD IS WRITTEN.

UM, AND SINCE WELL, WE'RE ON VIDEO NOW, SO IT'S NOT JUST RECORDED.

I, I CAN SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, MS. GRIFFIN WAS SHAKING HER HEAD.

YES.

TO MY YES.

STATEMENT.

YES.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

UM, MY, I DO, I DO HAVE A QUESTION THOUGH, IS WHY, WHY DID WE GEAR THE, THE APPLICANT TOWARDS THE TYPE FIVE, UM, WHEN TYPE FOUR STATE'S SUBSTANTIAL OUTDOOR STORAGE AS WELL.

CAUSE IT SEEMS LIKE THAT'S WHY THEY WERE WANTING THE TYPE FIVE SITE COMPONENT VERSUS SOMETHING OF A LESSER, LESSER INTENSITY.

I THINK IT'S CUZ THEY WANTED THE UNLIMITED STORAGE FOR THE PLANTS AND OTHER MATERIALS.

OKAY.

GOT IT.

UH, AND THEN I, I, I BEING LAST IS NO FUN BECAUSE EVERYBODY SAID EVERYTHING I WANTED TO SAY ANYWAY.

UM, I, I WILL JUST LIKE TO REMIND THOUGH THIS IS FOR ELLEN.

UH, I'D LIKE TO REMIND THAT THE, THE THREE FOLKS WHO SPOKE, UH, THE FIRST GENTLEMAN IN MS. FLORES AND MS. HILL, IF YOU, IF YOU WOULD PLEASE THERE'S COMMENT CARDS OUT IN THE BACK.

IF YOU COULD JUST WRITE YOUR NAME ON THAT, THAT WAY WE HAVE IT FOR THE RECORD AND GIVE IT TO MISS ELLEN DOWN THERE ON THE END BEFORE YOU LEAVE, WE WOULD GREATLY APPRECIATE THAT.

THAT'S IT? MS. CHAIR.

THANK YOU.

VICE CHAIR.

UM, I, I WILL TELL REPOSITION WHEN I FIRST SAW AND I SAW LC FIVE D MY FIRST REACTION WAS NO, BUT THEN WHEN I

[00:40:01]

WENT AND, AND I ACTUALLY LOOKED AT THE PRESENTATION, UM, THE ONLY THING THAT CAN HAPPEN ON THIS SITE BASED ON THE PUT IS A NURSERY.

UM, AND WHEN IT SOLD, IF SOMEBODY WANTS TO DO SOMETHING OTHER THAN A NURSERY, THEY HAVE TO COME BACK BEFORE THIS BOARD AND GET THIS BOARD'S APPROVAL OR, OR, AND THE, AND THE CITY COUNCIL'S APPROVAL.

UM, SO IF YOU ARE NOT OPPOSED TO HAVING A NURSERY, THIS IS OKAY, RIGHT.

IF YOU ARE NOT OPPOSED TO HAVING A NURSERY, THIS WILL BE WHAT YOU WILL GET.

UM, THAT BEING SAID, THIS IS AN ACTION ITEM AND I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY THE RIGHT SHARE WITH THE, THE EDIT, UH, THAT LAURA PRESENTED, UM, IN D ONE, EDIT A, TO SAY YES, RETAIL, NURSERY AND ASSOCIATED GOODS, AND THEN REMOVE C CORRECT WITH THAT, WITH THAT.

YES.

THAT'S ALL COMPLICATED.

I HAVE A, UH, I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE, UM, WITH THE, UH, EDIT.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND.

I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARPENTER, ALL IN FAVOR, OPPOSED MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

[11. Conduct a Public Hearing regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-027 to amend the current zoning of Interim SFR-1-B (Single-Family Rural) to adopt the 50 High Gabriel Minor PUD (Planned Unit Development) with a base zoning of GC-3-A (General Commercial) on one parcel of land approximately 1.59 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Williamson Central Appraisal District Parcel R474021; and more commonly known as 50 High Gabriel East, Leander, Williamson County, Texas. Discuss and consider action regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-027 as described above. Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation Open Public Hearing Close Public Hearing Discussion Consider Action]

ITEM, NUMBER 11, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING ZONING CASE 22 DASH Z DASH 27 TO AMEND THE CURRENT ZONING OF INTERIM SFR.

ONE B TO ADOPT A 50 GABRIEL MINOR PUT WITH BASE ZONING OF GC THREE, A ON ONE PARCEL OF LAND, APPROXIMATELY 1.59 ACRES PLUS OR MINUS IN SIZE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY WILLIAMSON COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT PARCEL R 4 74 0 2, 1 AND MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 50 HIGH GABRIEL EAST LEANDRO, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS STAFF PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU.

UH, SO I WANNA MAKE A CORRECTION, THE, UH, REPRESENTATIVE HERE TONIGHT, UH, FOR KIRKMAN ENGINEERING IS MR. PATRICK FOLSON.

UM, THE OTHER GENTLEMAN HAD A PREVIOUS ENGAGEMENT.

UM, SO THIS REQUEST IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE ZONING PROCESS.

UH, THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATED ZONING DISTRICT OF THEIR PROPERTY IN ORDER TO DEVELOP OFFICE AND RETAIL USES ON THE PROPERTY.

IT'S CONTINUATION.

THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE, UH, TO N ANNEXATION REQUEST.

IT IS 22, A 0 0 7.

THAT'S THE PROJECT NUMBER IN CASE YOU WANNA FOLLOW ALONG, WHICH WILL RUN CONCURRENTLY WITH THE ZONING REQUEST.

THE REQUESTED ANNEXATION AND ZONING IS IN LINE WITH A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED 50 HIGH GABRIEL EAST MINOR PUT, UH, WHICH IS ORDINANCE 22, 0 52 DASH ZERO ZERO, AND WOULD SERVE AND IS AS AN ADDITION TO THIS DEVELOPMENT, UH, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL, UH, TO, TO KIND OF SET THE SCENE FOR THE AREA, LET'S SEE TO THE NORTH IS ETJ AND INTERIM SFS, TWO B, WHICH IS UNDEVELOPED TO THE EAST IS ALSO ETJ.

AND IT IS A RESIDENTIAL, UH, TRACT TO THE SOUTH IS A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OR A POD, UH, THAT IS ALSO RESIDENTIAL.

AND IT IS THE BRYCESON SUBDIVISION, UH, TO THE WEST IS THE, UH, 50 HIGH GABRIEL, UH, EAST PU, UM, AND SITS UNDEVELOPED, UH, TODAY.

SO THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 180 3, A TOLL ROAD AND HIGH GABRIEL EAST.

THE TRACK IS BOUND TO THE NORTH BY AN UNDEVELOPED LOT AND TO THE EAST, BY A LARGE LOT, RESIDENTIAL GET AN AERIAL, UH, PHASE TWO SECTION.

ONE OF THE BRYSON SUBDIVISION IS SOUTH OF THE TRACT AND THE EAST, UH, TRACK IT'S.

THE REMAINDER OF THE TRACK IS AN UNDEVELOPED, UH, PORTION THAT IS 50 HIGH GABRIEL EAST PUT WITH THE BASE ZONING OF GC THREE, A, UH, THE PROPERTY, UH, IS CURRENTLY OUT OF THE FLOOD PLAIN IT'S UNDEVELOPED, AND IT CONTAINS SIGNIFICANT TREE COVER, WHICH WILL BE SUBJECT TO LEANDER TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS AND MITIGATION.

AT THE TIME OF SITE DEVELOPMENT, THE PROPERTY HAS ACCESS ONTO 50 HIGH GABRIEL EAST, UH, DRIVEWAYS ALONG HIGH GABRIEL WILL BE REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEERING STAFF AT SITE DEVELOPMENT STAGE.

THE DRIVEWAY SPACING ALONG HIGH GABRIEL WILL BE, UH, DICTATED BY THE AUSTIN TRANSPORTATION, UH, CRITERIA MANUAL.

THE ULTIMATE BUILD OUT OF HIGH GABRIEL MAY BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DURING THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.

ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT WILL SUBMIT EITHER A TIA TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS OR A FEE IN LIEU OF A TIA AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.

AGAIN, THE PROPERTY IS, UH, UNDEVELOPED AND UNPLATTED AT THE, AT THE TIME THIS PROPERTY HAS ACCESS TO BOTH WATER AND SEWER TO THE SOUTH, THROUGH THE BRYSON SUBDIVISION.

THAT'LL BE WORKED OUT WITH THE, UH, SITE DEVELOPMENT AS WELL, OR PS PLANS IF THOSE ARE, UH, NEEDED.

[00:45:02]

SO A DEVELOPMENT MEETING WAS HELD WITH STAFF, UH, IN DECEMBER OF 2021, NO SIGNIFICANT CHANGES WERE MADE TO THE PROPOSAL, UH, PRIOR TO THE OFFICIAL SUBMITTAL, UH, NOTIFICATIONS RAN IN THE, UH, HILL COUNTRY NEWS, AS WELL AS, UH, SIGNAGE PLACED ON SITE.

I THINK WE HAVE A PICTURE OF THAT, MAYBE NOT.

UH, SO IN YOUR PACKET, ON YOUR, UH, YOUR REPORT, YOU SHOULD HAVE SEEN THE, THE SIGNAGE THAT WAS PLACED ON SITE.

UM, AND TONIGHT IS THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING.

THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING IS SLATED FOR CITY COUNCIL, UH, OCTOBER THE 20TH AND THE SECOND READING OF THE, OR, OR THE SECOND, UH, PUBLIC HEARING AND FINAL READING OF THE ORDINANCE IS NOVEMBER 3RD.

UM, IN ADDITION TO THE NOTICE MELD ON BEHALF OF THE CITY TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET, THE AGENT REACHED OUT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS OF PROPERTY OWNED AS SINGLE FAMILY, AND, UH, ANY PROPERTIES USED AS SINGLE FAMILY USES WITHIN 500 FEET AS PER OUR COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE.

ANY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATED, LOCATED HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATED ASSOCIATION LOCATED WITHIN 500 FEET WERE ALSO CONTACTED.

UH, THE FOUR REPORT WAS INCLUDED IN YOUR PACKET AS ATTACHMENT NINE.

THE REQUEST, UH, IS PROPOSING A MINOR PUT TO ALLOW, UH, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF OFFICE AND RETAIL USES WITH THE BASE ZONING OF GC THREE, A WHICH IS IN LINE WITH THE, UH, REST OF THE 50 HIGH GABRIEL PUD.

THIS SITE WILL HAVE FRONTAGE OFF OF 180 3 AND SERVED AS ADDITIONAL.

IN ADDITION TO THE 50 HIGH GABRIEL EAST POD ALLOWABLE USES WITHIN THE POD ARE THOSE PERMITTED BY RIGHT WITHIN THE REQUESTED ZONING, UH, WITH THE APPLICANT ADDING SEVERAL PROHIBITED USES THAT ARE INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING USES, UH, AND AREA SUCH AS ANIMAL BOARDING BAR, LIQUOR STORE, OUTDOOR NURSERY, ET CETERA, UH, STAFF THEREFORE RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST.

UH, WE'LL OPEN IT UP TO THE, OR KICK IT OVER TO THE, UH, DEVELOPERS HERE TONIGHT.

UM, AND STAFF IS HERE TO ANSWER ANY OF YOUR QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU, MR. DALE, DO I HAVE AN AFTERNOON PRESENTATION? UH, GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS.

MY NAME IS PATRICK.

PSON 1130 COTTONWOOD CREEK TRAILED, CEDAR PARK, TEXAS 78, 613.

I AM REPRESENTING THE OWNERS TONIGHT.

AND JUST TO FOLLOW UP ON WHAT STAFF SAID, THIS IS KIND OF THE SECOND PART OF A TWO, TWO ZONING OR TWO PART ZONING PROCESS.

UH, THE PROPERTY JUST TO THE WEST IS ALL IT.

IT'LL BE ALL ONE DEVELOPMENT, AND WE'RE LOOKING TO JUST CONTINUE OR CONTINUE THAT ZONING PROCESS, UH, THROUGH THIS PROPERTY.

I'M HERE FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU MAY, YOU MAY HAVE, AND I WILL SIT BACK NOW.

THANKS SIR.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

IS THERE ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTER INTO DISCUSSION VICE CHAIR? MAN.

MY, MY BIGGEST QUESTION IS WHY GENERAL COMMERCIAL.

I SEE ALL THE RESTRICTED USES, BUT IF IN THEIR LETTER OF INTENT, THEY TALK ABOUT, UM, THE, THE INTENT IS FOR OFFICE AND RETAIL.

THEN WHY ARE WE NOT HAVING A LOCAL COMMERCIAL? IT'S NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN? I GET THAT THE, THEIR CONTINUATION OF THE PUT, BUT HOW FAR DO WE EXTEND THAT PRIORITY CORRIDOR DOWN? AND THEN THE, UM, THE, UH, SORRY, THE MULTI-USE CORRIDOR.

HOW FAR, HOW FAR TO THE EAST DO WE CONTINUE TO ALLOW IT TO EXPAND IF THE, IF THEY ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY TO THE EAST OF THEM, OR ARE WE GONNA CONTINUE WITH THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL BUD GOING FURTHER EAST? AND I THINK THAT'S THINGS THAT WE HAVE TO CONSIDER HERE WHEN WE'RE, WHEN WE'RE LOOKING AT THIS.

UM, I GUESS MY QUESTION WOULD BE TO THE APPLICANT OR TO STAFF, OR WHOEVER WANTS TO ASK IS, YOU KNOW, WHY, WHY NOT LOCAL COMMERCIAL AS A BASE OWNING DISTRICT VERSUS THE MORE INTENSE USE OF A GENERAL COMMERCIAL? SO I THINK IT'S A, A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT.

UM, BUT WE DO HAVE THE ABILITY TO CHANGE IT IF THEY CHOOSE TO DO SO IT'S WITHIN OUR, OUR RANGE.

SO IT'S, IT'S UP TO THEM.

YEAH.

YEAH.

THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.

AND WE'VE, WE'VE BATTLED WITH IT OURSELVES.

AND I THINK WHAT THE THOUGHT PROCESS IS TO KEEP IT AS ONE, UM, GENERAL, UM, ZONING DISTRICT THAT WE CAN OPERATE IT WITHIN.

SO WE DON'T HAVE A, YOU KNOW, A DIAGONAL LINE ACROSS THE, A PROPERTY THAT HAS TWO DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICTS.

THAT'S ONE, AND THEN TWO LOCAL COMMERCIAL.

THE, THE ONLY REAL ISSUE WE HAVE THERE WE'VE PERMITTED OR, UM, REDUCED ALL THE USES THAT WOULD BE, UM, MAJOR ISSUES, I THINK.

AND THE ONLY REAL PROBLEM IS THE HOURS OF OPERATION.

UH, WE'D LIKE TO, YOU KNOW, STAY WITHIN THE HOURS OPERATION WITHIN GENERAL COMMERCIAL.

AND THAT WAS GONNA BE MY NEXT QUESTION THEN, BECAUSE THAT'S ALSO A CONSIDERATION WHEN YOU'RE BACKING UP INTO A

[00:50:01]

SINGLE FAMILY, RESIDENTIAL THAT'S TO YOUR SOUTH IS IF YOU WANT PAST 11:00 PM ON FRIDAY AND SATURDAY NIGHT, YOU KNOW, PAST 10, 10:00 PM ON SUNDAY THROUGH THURSDAY, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S GONNA BE A TOUGH SELL FOR ME AS WELL, CONSIDERING THAT YOU'RE MOVING RIGHT INTO ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL.

SO, AND TO THAT POINT, WE DID HAVE A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING WITH THE, UH, HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INVITED EVERYBODY OUT, DISCUSS THAT WITH THEM AND DISCUSS IT, BE IN GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND HAVE MET WITH THE, UH, NEIGHBOR, JUST TO THE EAST AS WELL.

UM, MULTIPLE TIMES DISCUSSING THE DEVELOPMENT AND HAVE HAD NO OPPOSITION TO ANYTHING THAT WE'VE BEEN PROPOSING.

ROBIN, WHAT ARE THE HOURS FOR GENERAL COMMERCIAL? THERE ARE NONE.

OKAY.

THAT'S ALL I NEED TO KNOW.

THANKS COMMISSIONER, MAY ONE QUESTION FOR STAFF, TH THIS IS THE SAME RESTRICTIONS AND REQUEST FOR THE, WAS TO THE PROPERTY OF THE WEST, CORRECT? YES.

RIGHT.

COMMISSIONER MOST, UM, I'M JUST A LITTLE CONFUSED ABOUT THE HOURS NOW, YOU SAYING THERE'S NOT, YOU'RE NOT REQUIRED TO HAVE CERTAIN HOURS FOR WHAT'S WHAT'S THE BUSINESS THAT YOU'RE GONNA HAVE THERE.

WELL, WITH OUR, OUR ZONING GENERAL COMMERCIAL DOESN'T HAVE HOURS OF OPERATION LIMITS MM-HMM , UM, AND I CAN LET HIM SPEAK TO WHAT HOURS THEY WOULD PROPOSE.

UH, SO WE DON'T HAVE A SPECIFIC BUSINESS OF MIND.

THERE'LL BE A, A COUPLE OF BUILDINGS THAT RUN DOWN HIGH GABRIEL THAT FACE HIGH GABRIEL THAT WILL BACK UP TO THE SUB THE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION.

UM, THERE'LL BE NO, THERE'S NO ACCESS THAT THERE'LL BE ON THAT BACKSIDE BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS AND, AND THE, UH, SUBDIVISION, BUT THERE'S, THERE'S NOT A BUSINESS PART IN PARTICULAR IN MIND, UM, THAT WOULD NEED IT, YOU KNOW, THE ADDITIONAL HOURS.

BUT I THINK THE THOUGHT IS TO KEEP IT THE SAME ZONING AND NOT HAVE THE RESTRICTED HOURS IN PLACE, UM, ON THE ZONING.

OKAY.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER AHEAD.

HAVE YOU GUYS THOUGHT ABOUT BUYING THE PROPERTY, I GUESS, OFF TO THE RIGHT THAT ISN'T ZONED THE SAME? SO WE'VE SPOKEN WITH THAT HOMEOWNER, HAVE HE ACTUALLY OWNS A, A PRETTY SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF THAT LAND AND TO THE, TO THE EAST AND TO THE NORTHEAST, UM, AND IS, I BELIEVE IN THE PROCESS OF SELLING THAT TO A, A RESIDENTIAL, UH, DEVELOPER, UM, THERE'S JUST A SMALL PORTION OF THAT, OF THAT PROPERTY, ABOUT EIGHT TENS OF AN ACRE, AN ACRE THAT WOULD GET US TO A BETTER SEWER LOCATION.

MM-HMM UM, THAT WE'VE BEEN IN DISCUSSIONS WITH PURCHASING FROM 'EM, BUT NOTHING'S GONE PAST THE DISCUSSION POINT.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

I'VE GOT A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT TOO.

SO BEFORE YOU GET SEATED AGAIN, YOU MIGHT AS WELL SIT ON THE FRONT ROW.

UM, THE, THE HOURS IN GENERAL COMMERCIAL, IS THAT PRIMARILY FOR RESTAURANT THAT Y'ALL ARE LOOKING AT, MAYBE I, I DON'T THINK IT'S PRIMARILY FOR ANYTHING, TO BE HONEST, I, I, I THINK THE LESS RESTRICTIVE OR LESS RESTRICTION MAKES IT EASY TO SELL THE PROPERTY, OBVIOUSLY.

AND, AND I THINK THAT'S THE THOUGHT PROCESS, YOU KNOW, THE FURTHER YOU GET AWAY FROM THE, THE FRONT, THE REALLY THE HIGHWAY FRONTAGE, THE, THE LESSER CHANCE THAT YOU'RE GONNA HAVE A RESTAURANT BACK THERE.

I, I DON'T, YOU KNOW, I CAN'T ENVISION SEEING THE RESTAURANT BACK THERE, IT'S GOING, I, IN MY OPINION, IT'LL BE MEDICAL OFFICE.

THAT'S WHAT, WHAT INTERESTS WE'RE GETTING TODAY.

SO THE, THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IS ON THE MARKET NOW, AND, AND WE'RE GETTING SIGNIFICANT INTEREST FOR MEDICAL USERS.

AND I, I THINK THAT THAT'S WHAT THERE WILL BE A SERIES OF FOUR BUILDINGS THAT WILL, AND LIKELY ALL BE IN MEDICAL OFFICES.

UM, BUT, YOU KNOW, WITHOUT THAT'S NOT DONE YET.

AND SO WE WANT TO KIND LEAVE AS MUCH, UM, OPTIONS ON THE TABLE AS POSSIBLE.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

MM-HMM COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.

YOU MIGHT AS WELL STAY THERE.

THERE WE GO.

UM, WHY WASN'T THIS INCLUDED WITH THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST, THE HIGH GABRIEL, WHEN IT ORIGINALLY CAME IN? THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.

AND SO IT WASN'T IN THE CITY OF LIMITS AND THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST WAS, AND SO WE'VE HAD, ANEX DID WHERE ANNEX, ANNEX AND ZONING IS AT THE SAME TIME AND TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY.

YOU KNOW, IT'S ALL A TIMING COMPONENT.

THE PREVIOUS OWNER OF THE PROPERTY DOESN'T WANT TO WAIT FOR A LONG, A LONGER PERIOD OF TIME TO ANNEX AND ZONE A, A PROPERTY.

AND THEN WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE COULD GET THE, THE ZONING ON THE FRONT HALF.

RIGHT.

I KNOW WE WORKED WITH STAFF THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS AND FELT COMFORTABLE THAT WE WOULD GET THE, THE ZONING ON THE BACK HALF AND THEN CLOSE ON THE PROPERTY AT THAT TIME, ONCE THE ZONING ON THE FRONT HALF WAS, WELL, I HAVE SOME ISSUES

[00:55:01]

WITH THE HOURS TOO, BEING THAT, UM, IT WOULD BE MUCH BETTER TO BE A LOCAL COMMERCIAL VERSUS IS THAT WHERE WE'RE AT THEN GENERAL COMMERCIAL.

AND I THINK THE BIG DIFFERENCE I HAVE WITH THIS IS THAT THE PROPERTY TO THE WEST IN THE DIDN'T HAVE A BACKUP TO ALL THOSE RESIDENCES, THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY BACKS UP TO, WELL, 10 PRO 10 PIECES OF PROPERTY WHERE THE OTHER ONE BACKED UP TO ONE AND A HALF.

SO TO ME THAT THAT'S A LITTLE BIT OF A DIFFERENT ISSUE, AND I WOULDN'T SEE ANY BIG ISSUE WITH BEING LOCAL COMMERCIAL BACK THERE FOR IF, IF, IF YOUR INTEREST IS TRULY, YOU KNOW, THOSE OTHER MEDICAL AND STUFF LIKE THAT, THAT REALLY SHOULDN'T BE THERE, BUT THAT WOULD AT LEAST RESTRICT THOSE PEOPLE AND GET SOME HOURS INTO THERE FOR THOSE PEOPLE THAT YOU'RE, YOU'RE BACK UP AGAINST.

SO, YOU KNOW, MY ISSUE WOULD BE THAT, SO THAT'S MY CONCERN.

SO RICK, THE, THE WESTERN PIECE, IT DOES BACK UP TO RESIDENTIAL.

IT JUST ISN'T, UM, FINISHED WITH DEVELOPMENT YET.

THEY'VE JUST STARTED BUILDING THE ROADS.

THERE WILL BE HOMES BACKING UP TO THAT ONE AS WELL.

OKAY.

OKAY.

SORRY.

ANY OTHER DISCUSSION? YES.

BLESS YOUR, I WAS GONNA SAY THAT, UM, I, I KNOW THERE'S SOME CONCERN ABOUT KEEPING A CONTIGUOUS ZONING THROUGHOUT YOUR ENTIRE PROPERTY, BUT WHEN THE FIRST PIECE CAME TO US, I ACTUALLY SPECIFICALLY MENTIONED THIS ABOUT THE, IF YOU'RE GONNA RESTRICT ALL THE USES, GET THE BASE ZONING OF A LOCAL COMMERCIAL.

AND, AND I ALSO REMEMBER SAYING THAT, UH, YOU'RE GONNA HAVE A HARDER TIME WITH THIS PIECE THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING TONIGHT.

UM, TRYING TO BRING THAT IN AS GENERAL COMMERCIAL AS WELL, AT LEAST WITH ME.

RIGHT.

CAUSE I HAVE, I HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF HEARTBURN WITH THAT BECAUSE I DON'T THINK IT'S COMPATIBLE, UH, IN THE LOCATION THAT IT'S AT.

SO THAT'S ALL, I JUST WANTED TO SAY ANY OTHER DISCUSSION, I JUST HAVE A QUESTION ON THE, SO THERE'S A ROAD RIGHT ABOVE, UM, THAT LINE.

THEY HAVE TO, UM, CAN'T THINK OF THE WORD OFF THE TOP, BUT FIX, YEAH.

IMPROVE.

THANK YOU.

YEAH.

THEY'LL, THEY'LL NEED TO IMPROVE IT TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE, THE PROPERTY.

OKAY.

AND THE ROAD THAT KIND OF GOES TOWARDS THE KIND OF THE BACK END.

YES.

THANK YOU.

THAT ROAD THAT GOES TO THE BACK END TOWARDS THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

THAT WILL BE WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO THAT LITTLE PIECE RIGHT THERE.

IT LOOKS LIKE THAT'S A DRIVE TO A HOUSE, RIGHT? YEAH.

THAT'S A PRIVATE DRIVE.

YEAH.

CORRECT.

OH, I SEE.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THERE'S AN OLD TRAILER HOUSE THERE.

I BELIEVE ANYBODY ELSE.

MY, UM, I, I, I AGREE WITH, WITH SOME OF WHAT DEVICE CHAIR SAYS IN THAT MY, I, I WAS WILLING ON THE WESTERN PIECE BECAUSE THERE WEREN'T HOUSES THERE ALREADY.

UM, AND BUYERS COULD THEN MAKE THEIR OWN CHOICES BASED ON, ON WHETHER OR NOT THEY WANTED TO LIVE THERE.

MY, MY, I HAVE A BIT OF AN ISSUE WITH GENERAL COMMERCIAL, NOT JUST NEXT TO SOMEBODY THAT'S OWN RESIDENTIAL, BUT THE FACT THAT THERE ARE ALREADY HOUSES ON THE GROUND, RIGHT.

THERE ARE, I MEAN, THERE ARE HOUSES ON THE GROUND THERE.

PEOPLE ARE LIVING THERE.

AND, AND SO, UM, THAT IS, IS I, I, I WOULD SAY, UM, THAT, UM, I DON'T KNOW IF, IF CONTIGUOUS ZONING IS, IS A GOOD ENOUGH REASON TO MAKE IT GENERAL COMMERCIAL WHEN YOU COULD MAKE IT LOCAL COMMERCIAL AND, AND, UM, I THINK IT MOVES THROUGH WITHOUT A PROBLEM.

UM, THAT'S ALL I HAVE TO SAY, BUT THIS IS AN ACTION ITEM.

SO ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

WHEN CAN I DO SOMETHING REAL QUICK? UM, THIS IS AN INSTANCE WHERE IF YOU WANNA GIVE THE APPLICANT A CHANCE TO REVIEW IT, UM, AND COME BACK AT THE NEXT MEETING, LIKE HE MIGHT NEED TO TALK TO PEOPLE ABOUT HOURS OR USES, BUT WE HAVE TIME.

THERE'S A MEETING BETWEEN COUNCIL AND NOW, SO IT, YOU'RE NOT DELAYED, BUT IT WOULD GIVE YOU A CHANCE TO TALK TO EVERYBODY ELSE TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE IN SAFE.

WE, OR WE'RE WE'RE WE COULD MAKE LOCAL COMMERCIAL.

WELL, HAVING HEARD, YOU KNOW, HAVING HEARD THE, THE, THE CONCERNS OF, OF, OF THE COMMISSION, WHY DON'T YOU GO BACK AND, AND YOU GUYS HAVE A DISCUSSION.

SO YOU, INSTEAD OF JUST MAKING A DECISION NOW TO COME BACK AND SAY, HERE'S WHAT WE WANNA DO AND WHY WE WANNA DO IT.

AND, AND WE CAN DO THAT.

OR WE CAN MOVE WITH LOCAL COMMERCIAL TONIGHT.

I I'M, I'M, WE'RE COMFORTABLE WITH LOCAL COMMERCIAL.

IT'S EASIER.

IT'S EVEN EASIER IF YOU, IF YOU'RE, IF YOU'RE COMFORTABLE MAKING THAT PIECE LOCAL COMMERCIAL, THEN I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE BASE ZONING OF LOCAL COMMERCIAL.

I HAVE A AGENT, HOLD ON.

I'M SORRY.

I HAVE A, UH, WITH THE LOCAL COMMERCIAL AND THEN ADDING THE PROHIBIT

[01:00:02]

PROHIBIT, THEY ARE PROHIBITED BY.

YEAH, THEY ARE, THEY'LL BE AUTOMATICALLY ED BY LOCAL PROMOTION.

OKAY, PERFECT.

SO I HAVE A MOTION BY THE VICE HAVE A SECOND, BY REAL QUICK, ONE MORE THING.

SO ON THE, ON THE ZONING ITSELF, IT'S, UM, GC THREE A, SO WE HAVE THREE PIECES.

SO WE CHANGING IT TO LC TWO, A, UM, IF YOU DO LC THREE, A IT ALLOWS THINGS LIKE GAS STATIONS.

UM, JUST SOMETHING YOU'RE LOOKING AT, JUST ONE PIECE.

WELL, IF IT, IF IT WAS GC THREE, A THEY COULD DO A GAS STATION AS WELL.

RIGHT? CORRECT.

RIGHT.

YEAH.

SO TECHNICALLY THE TYPE THREE DOESN'T COMPLY IN THIS SCENARIO, CUZ YOU HAVE TO HAVE A, A LESS RESTRICTIVE USE NEXT DOOR.

DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE TRANSITION.

IT DOES ACTUALLY.

THAT'S A GOOD CALL OUT.

AND, AND ACTUALLY WHAT I WAS GONNA ASK THE APPLICANT THOUGH, IF WE'RE MOVING IT DOWN TO LOCAL COMMERCIAL, ARE THERE ANY INTENDED USES THAT AREN'T CURRENTLY IN LOCAL COMMERCIAL THAT YOU WOULD LIKE ADDED IN AS AN OPTION? I DON'T.

YOU THAT'S WHY YOU MIGHT USES EXCEPT FOR GAS STATION THAT WOULD NOT BE ALLOWED IN LOCAL COMMERCIAL ANYWAY.

AND LOCAL COMMERCIAL.

YEAH.

MM-HMM AND I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT OVER, YOU KNOW, BACK TO THE, I SEE THE COMPATIBLE ZONING.

I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE WE'RE THERE.

SO THEN, THEN I WILL AMEND MY ZONING RECOMMENDATION TO AN LC TWO A CUZ THAT'S MORE COMPATIBLE WITH LOCAL COMMERCIAL.

DO YOU STILL SECOND, SECOND.

SO WE HAVE A MOTION.

LET'S GET IT.

ALL RIGHT.

WE HAVE A MOTION BY VICE CHAIR, MAN, TO APPROVE A, UM, ZONING OF LC TWO A I HAVE A SECOND BY, WE HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER LAND TRIPP, ALL IN FAVOR.

OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

I

[12. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider action regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-028 to amend the current zoning of T6 (Urban Core Zone) to adopt the Metro Way Medical Center PUD (Planned Unit Development) with the LC-2-A (Local Commercial) on one parcel of land approximately 4.37 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Williamson Central Appraisal District Parcel R573740; and generally located to the northeast S US 183 and Metro Dr., Leander, Williamson County, Texas. Discuss and consider action regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-028 as described above. Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation Open Public Hearing Close Public Hearing Discussion Consider Action]

AM 12 CONDUCT, A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ASHTON REGARDING ZONING CASE 22 DASH Z DASH 28.

TO AMEND THE CURRENT ZONING OF T SIX URBAN CORE ZONE TO ADOPT A METRO WAY MEDICAL CENTER PUD WITH A, WITH THE LC TWO A ON ONE PARCEL OF LAND, APPROXIMATELY 4.37 ACRES PLUS OR MINUS AND SIGNS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY WILLIAMSON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT AS R 5 7 3 7 4 0.

AND GENERALLY LOCATED TO THE NORTHEAST OF SOUTH US 180 3 AND METRO DRIVE LEANDRO WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS STAFF PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS MICHAEL CHENOWSKI PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

SO THIS REQUEST IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE ZONING PROCESS.

UH, THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATED ZONING DISTRICT OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO DEVELOP THE PROPERTY UNDER THE COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE.

UH, SO SOME OF THE SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS, UH, BACK IN 2020 CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE ORDINANCE 2014 DASH ZERO ZERO, WHICH ALLOWED LANDOWNERS WITHIN THE TD TO DEVELOP, UH, UNDER THE COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE RATHER THAN THE SMART CODE, THE COMPOSITE, UH, OR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LISTS APPROPRIATE LAND USES, UH, TYPES IN GREENWAYS, UH, WHICH AS YOU CAN SEE IN THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP THIS PROPERTIES WITHIN THE GREENWAY, UH, CATEGORY AS INSTITUTIONAL OR OTHER, UH, WITH OTHER REFERRING TO STORM WATER FACILITIES.

UH, HOWEVER, THE GREENWAY LAND USE CATEGORY IS NOT LIMITED TO JUST ONE AREA.

IT COVERS ROUGHLY THE ENTIRE FLOOD, PLAIN OF ALL CREEKS AND, UH, RIVERS WITHIN THE CITY.

UM, AND BECAUSE OF THAT, BECAUSE OF THIS LARGE AREA, THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ALSO LISTS ALL ZONING DISTRICTS AS SUITABLE WITHIN THE GREENWAY.

UH, THIS PROPERTY IS ALSO LOCATED, UH, AT THE INTERSECTION OF AN ARTERIAL AND A COLLECTOR CLASS ROADWAY.

UH, SO COMMERCIAL USES ARE APPROPRIATE AT THIS LOCATION.

UH, SO SOME OF THE SURROUNDING AREAS, UH, ARE CAP METRO STATION JUST TO THE SOUTH, UH, US 180 3, UH, TO THE EAST AND THE NORTHLINE DEVELOPMENT CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, UH, TO THE NORTH, UH, EAST.

AND THIS PROPERTY HAS ACCESS, UH, ONTO METRO DRIVE.

IT DOES HAVE ACCESS TO UTILITIES.

UH, A DEVELOPMENT MEETING WAS HELD WITH STAFF BACK IN JULY.

UH, NO CHANGES WERE MADE TO THIS PROPOSAL.

UH, SINCE THAT MEETING, UH, THERE WERE NO SINGLE FAMILY PROPERTIES WITHIN THE 500 FOOT NOTIFICATION BOUNDARY.

UH, SO THERE WERE NO CONCERNS NOTED, UH, FROM THE PUBLIC OUTREACH.

UH, THIS PROPERTY IS UNIQUE, UNIQUELY SITUATED TO THE NORTHEAST OF METRO DRIVE AND US 180 3 BETWEEN CAP METRO STATION, UH, AND THE NORTHLINE DEVELOPMENT.

THE PROPERTY'S ADJACENT TO THE INTERSECTION OF AN ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR CLASS ROADWAY, UH, WHICH LENDS ITSELF TO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.

UH, IT SHOULD BE NOTED ALSO THAT, UH, THE GREENWAYS DO SNAP TO THE FLOOD PLAIN BOUNDARY.

SO AS THE, UH, PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED, UM, AND THE FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY IS ADJUSTED, UH, THAT GREENWAY WILL ALSO BE ADJUSTED.

UH, SO THIS MINOR PUT, UH, ALSO INCLUDES A REQUESTED WAIVER FOR REDUCED FRONT SETBACK FROM 30 FEET TO 15 FEET.

AND

[01:05:01]

I'LL BE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING.

THANK YOU, SIR.

YOU HAVE AN APPLICANT PRESENTATION.

GOOD EVENING.

MY NAME'S JOSH T I'M THE CEO OF ABACUS RED, WHICH IS THE DEVELOPER FUTURE DEVELOPER OF THIS SITE AND THE APPLICANT ONE CLARIFICATION TO THE PAPERWORK AND THE DEVELOPMENT, UH, DISCUSSION WE HAD DISCUSSED ACTUALLY A SETBACK REDUCTION TO 10 FEET AS OPPOSED TO 15 FEET.

YES.

SO I, I THINK YOU RECALL THAT ONE ROBIN, JUST AS A CLARIFICATION THERE, AND THAT'S THE MAIN ALLOW FOR FLEXIBILITY OF DEVELOPMENT OF THIS SITE GEOGRAPHICALLY, YOU CAN SEE, WE DO HAVE SOME IMPINGEMENT ALONG THE FLOOD, PLAIN.

AND SO IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR A PROPER BUILDING STRUCTURE AND APPROPRIATE, UM, FLOW ROADS, CIRCULATION ROADS, AND ALSO PARKING FIELD, THAT'S THE PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST? UM, ANTHONY GOOD FROM GOOD FAITH ENGINEERING IS MY CIVIL ENGINEER.

HE'S HERE IN SUPPORT AS WELL.

SO WE DON'T HAVE A SUPPLEMENTAL PRESENTATION, BUT WE'RE HERE.

HAPPY TO ANSWER QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU.

YOU'RE WELCOME.

AND THAT WAS MY TYPO, SO WE CAN FIX IT.

I'M GONNA STAY HERE.

I'VE LEARNED BE RIGHT HERE WAITING.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

IS ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? SEE NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTER A DISCUSSION.

WE'LL START WITH COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.

THIS IS, UH, THE PROPOSED USE OF THIS.

DID I SEE? I DIDN'T REALLY, IT'S BASICALLY JUST FITTING WITHIN THE CURRENT, THE ZONING SO THEY CAN DO ANYTHING WITHIN THAT ZONING OKAY.

SO IT SAYS THEY'RE PROPOSING COMMERCIAL USES INCLUDING MEDICAL OFFICES, BUT THAT DOESN'T LIMIT US TO MEDICAL OFFICE.

WELL, IT'S A LOCAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, RIGHT.

BUT LOCAL COMMERCIAL HAS A WHOLE LOT OF OTHER THINGS YOU CAN PUT IN THERE TOO.

YES.

SO I COULD DO, UM, RETAIL RESTAURANTS.

UM, IT DOES NOT ALLOW THINGS LIKE BARS AND NIGHTCLUBS AND WAREHOUSING, UM, GAS STATIONS, BUT IT'S MORE LIKE YOUR LOCAL COMMERCIAL USES, WHICH IS REALLY ON MAIN ENTRANCE TO THE NORTHLINE PROJECT.

MM-HMM YES.

SO ARE WE DOING SOMETHING THAT'S CONTRARY TO WHAT OTHER PEOPLE HAVE FOR PLAN DEVELOPMENT OR THAT'S REALLY NOT OUR CONCERN IS IT? WELL, ALL OF THESE USES ARE ALSO ALLOWED IN THE NORTHLINE PROJECT.

UM, THE MAIN DIFFERENCE WOULD BE THE, THE FORM OF THE BUILDINGS.

RIGHT.

OKAY.

THAT WAS THE MAIN CONCERN COMMISSIONER OLAN.

OKAY.

MY QUESTION IS FOR STAFF, YOU CAN STILL STAY THERE.

THAT'S OKAY.

I'LL WAIT.

UM, MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE T SIX URBAN HORIZON ZONE, CURRENT ZONING, AND THIS LC TWO A THAT IS BEING PROPOSED.

AND I THINK THE OTHER WAS TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH NORTHLINE AND, AND THE BUILDINGS WOULD BE, UM, MORE, YOU KNOW, BE SIMILAR.

I MEAN, WHAT IS THE MAIN DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO? I WOULD SAY, UM, WHAT THEY'RE REQUESTING IS KIND OF A, A REDUCTION.

UM, SO THE T SIX IS A SMART COAT CATEGORY AND IT ALLOWS FOR TALLER BUILDINGS.

IT ALLOWS FOR MORE DENSITY, UM, THEIR PROPOSAL WITH THE, THE FLOOD PLAIN MADE IT CHALLENGING TO COMPLY WITH THOSE STANDARDS.

SO THEY'RE CHOOSING TO SELECT THE COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS AND DO THE LOCAL COMMERCIAL.

SO IT'S A, IT'S LESS DENSE AND IT, IT WON'T HAVE THE SAME, UH, STREET LINE BUILDINGS, UM, YEAH, STREET LINE BUILDINGS LINE THE STREET, I'M SAYING THAT BACKWARDS.

UM, BUT IT IT'LL BE A LITTLE DIFFERENT.

OKAY.

UM, OKAY.

I DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR YOU.

SURE.

SO THIS, UH, IS GOING TO ELIMINATE SOME OF THE, WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE CURRENT ZONING, THERE WAS SOME OPEN SPACE, YOU KNOW, BEHIND THIS PAR OR AS PART OF THIS AREA, THERE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE OPEN SPACE.

AND THEN THE NORTHLINE CIVIC, UM, BUILDINGS WERE SUPPOSED TO BE, I GUESS, RIGHT ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THAT.

AND SO Y'ALL ARE BUILDING INTO THAT OPEN SPACE, CORRECT.

WHAT'S CURRENTLY SHOWN IS OPEN SPACE WHEN YOU'RE REFERRING TO OPEN SPACE.

I'M NOT, I'M NOT QUITE CERTAIN WHICH ONE? UM, IT'S THE, UM, SO THAT GREEN AREA IS NOT PART OF NORTHLINE, THAT'S A LAND'S CATEGORY IN THE SMART CODE THAT FOLLOWS THE FLOOD PLAIN.

RIGHT.

BUT IT'S SHOWN ON HERE AS OPEN SPACE WITHIN, I THINK THAT'S PART OF PROJECT.

OKAY.

SEE, I THINK IF YOU WORK BACK TO THE, IF YOU WORK BACK TO THE AERIAL, YOU'LL SEE A ROCK WALL THAT DELINEATES THE MAJORITY OF THE BUILDABLE AREA.

IS THAT THE KIND WHITE

[01:10:01]

LINE? WELL, OKAY.

THE WHITE LINE.

SO YOU CAN SEE THE WHITE LINE THERE.

YEAH, RIGHT THERE.

OKAY.

THERE ARE SOME IMPROVEMENT SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT WILL EXTEND SLIGHTLY BEYOND THAT LINE IN TERMS OF PARKING AREA, BUT OUR ANTENNA IS TO REMAIN LARGELY WITHIN THAT PERIMETER.

OKAY.

OKAY.

ALL RIGHT.

THAT ANSWERS ALL MY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU.

OKAY.

YOU'RE WELCOME.

COMMISSIONER HAMPTON.

UM, TWO SLIDES FORWARD, MICHAEL, I THINK YOU HAD THE ROAD.

UH, DID YOU HAVE A, A CAR AND SIDEWALK A SECOND AGO OR IS THAT A DIFFERENT, IT'S A RIGHT THERE.

UM, THE SIDEWALK.

SO I THINK YOU HAD ON HERE SIX FEET, IS THAT CORRECT? AM I READING THAT CORRECTLY ON THE, YOU SAY SIX FEET? I MIGHT BE SAYING WRONG.

YEAH.

SIX FEET.

YES.

SO ON THE, UM, TRANSPORTATION PLAN REQUIREMENTS, UH, I BELIEVE IT HAS SIX FOOT SIDEWALK, FOUR LANES.

THAT SOUNDS RIGHT.

AND THEN, UM, ON THERE IT'S SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED OFF OF, UH, DURING THEIR REVIEW PROCESS.

SO AS THE SIDEWALK, IS THAT LOOKING TO BE KIND OF TOWARDS, UM, 180 3, LIKE NEXT TO THE ROAD? OR IS THAT GONNA BE ON THE INSIDE? I GUESS THAT'S MY QUESTION, METRO, ACTUALLY, IT'S METRO, IF YOU GO BACK TO THE AERIAL AGAIN, A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF THAT SIDEWALK IS ALREADY CONSTRUCTED.

RIGHT, RIGHT.

AND IT'LL SHOW YOU THERE.

IT'LL CONTINUE ALONG THE NORTHERN SIDE OF METRO DRIVE.

OKAY.

I GUESS THIS IS, THIS IS GONNA BE A QUESTION FOR STAFF.

UM, ON THE SOUTH OF THAT, OF METRO, THEY HAVE THE WALKWAY, WOULD THERE BE A WALKWAY TO GO BACK ACROSS? SO YOU KNOW, WHERE THE WHATABURGER IS? THERE'S A WALKWAY TO CROSS FROM TO GET ACROSS FROM METRO MM-HMM SAFELY.

WOULD THEY HAVE THE SAME THING ON THE RIGHT SIDE? ON THE, I GUESS NORTHERN SIDE OF THAT, IS IT LIKE ADA RAMP THAT GOES TOWARDS 180 3 OR IT'S JUST LIKE A, UH, YOU PUSH A BUTTON SO YOU CAN WALK ACROSS MM-HMM , THERE'S LIKE A, JUST A SAFETY WALK.

SO PEOPLE KNOW THAT THEY CAN'T DRIVE, YOU CAN WALK AND IT'S OKAY TO WALK AND WE'D HAVE TO, TO LOOK INTO THAT.

THAT'S KIND OF OUTSIDE OF THE, THE ZONING, BUT WE COULD, WE COULD FIND OUT OKAY.

THAT'S ALL I HAVE COMMISSIONER WALKS.

UM, I DON'T, I DON'T THINK I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

I, I BELIEVE YOU ANSWERED, UH, THE QUESTIONS.

OKAY.

OKAY, GREAT.

THANK YOU.

COMMISSION REMAIN.

JUST ONE QUESTION ON THE ENTRANCES AND EXITS, ARE THEY ALL GONNA BE ON METRO OR PULLMAN STREET? ALL OF THIS SITE ENTRANCES WILL BE A LONG METRO.

OKAY.

SO NOTHING OFF OF 180 3.

NO.

CORRECT.

WE, WE ACTUALLY, YEAH, WE'RE I, I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT I'M GOOD.

THANKS CHAIR.

UM, THE ONLY, ONLY HAD SLIGHT HEARTBURN WITH THE 10 FOOT SETBACK, UH, REDUCTION FROM 30 FEET, BUT I SAY ONLY SLIGHT CUZ I UNDERSTAND YOUR REASONING BEHIND IT AND GIVEN THE LIMITATIONS OF THE SPACE THAT YOU HAVE.

UH, SO TO THE SURPRISE OF PROBABLY EVERYONE, I GOT NOTHING ELSE.

I THINK THIS IS GOOD.

OKAY.

UH, I HAVE NO QUESTIONS.

OKAY, GREAT.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

THIS IS A ACTION ITEM.

WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION.

MOTION TO APPROVE.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MAY.

I'LL SECOND, SECOND BY VICE CHAIR, MAN.

ALL IN FAVOR.

OPPOSED MOTION CARRIES FIVE TO TWO WOULD UH, COMMISSIONER LAND TRIP LIKE TO STATE FOR THE RECORD, HER OPPOSITION.

I JUST THINK IT SHOULD REMAIN T SIX TO BE MORE COMPATIBLE WITH, UH, THE NORTHLINE THE ADJACENT NORTHLINE PROJECT COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.

THAT'S MY FEELING, UH, TOO.

IT IT'S ZONED AS OPEN SPACE RIGHT NOW.

AND I THINK UNTIL NORTHLINE IS MUCH MORE FURTHER DEVELOPED, I'M A LITTLE LEERY OF STEPPING IN THERE AND LETTING SOMEBODY DECIDE TO DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT.

MR. JEREMY, IS THAT POSSIBLE TO MAKE A COMMENT AS TO WHY IT'S NOT POSSIBLE? YES, SIR.

AND, AND BEFORE YOU DO, SIR, I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION ROBIN, DID WE NEED TO, DID WE NEED TO MAKE THAT MOTION WITH THE 10 FOOT SETBACK RESTRICTION INSTEAD OF THE 15 THAT'S IN THE AGENDA ITEM? YES.

SO DO WE HAVE TO REVOKE? YES.

OKAY.

MAYBE YOU CAN LET HIM SAY HIS PIECE FIRST.

YEAH.

SORRY.

WITH REGARD TO THE T SIX ZONING, THE REASONING, WHY WE RE A BIG PART OF, ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE REQUESTED THE CHANGE IS THAT T SIX REQUIRES PHYSICAL BUILDING STRUCTURES TO FRONT ALONG METRO WAY.

IF YOU LOOK AT THE GEOGRAPHY OF THE SITE, IT'S NOT POSSIBLE TO CREATE A PARKING FIELD BEHIND BUILDING STRUCTURES ON THAT EASTERN SIDE.

ADDITIONALLY, THERE'S ALSO A, UM, A MAIN, A SEWER MAIN THAT RUNS THROUGH THAT EASTERN HALF OF THE PROPERTY, WHICH MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE TO

[01:15:01]

BUILD A BUILDING STRUCTURE WITHOUT RELOCATION OF THAT SEWER LINE.

SO BECAUSE OF THAT, T SIX IS NOT A PROPER ZONING FOR THIS SITE THAT ALLOWS FOR DEVELOPMENT.

SO I'D LIKE YOU TO LIKE TO REQUEST YOU TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION AS A PART OF YOUR VOTE HERE THIS EVENING AS WELL.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

THANK YOU.

I'M GONNA RECALL THE ITEM.

THIS IS AN ACTION ITEM, SO I'LL, I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE 10 FOOT SETBACKS.

WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE 10 FOOT SETBACK BY COMMISSIONER MAY.

AND I'LL SECOND SECOND BY VICE CHAIR.

MAY ALL IN FAVOR OPPOSED MOTION CARRIE, FIVE, TWO.

I AM.

I'M GOING TO TAKE IT THAT THE OBJECTIONS REMAIN THE SAME THING.

PERFECT.

OKAY.

THANK YOU.

[13. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider action regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-029 to amend the current zoning of Interim SFR-1-B (Single-Family Rural) to HC-4-D (Heavy Commercial) on two parcels of land approximately 9.111 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Williamson Central Appraisal District Parcels R031284 and R324449; and more commonly known as 2967 & 3005 Hero Way, Leander, Williamson County, Texas. Discuss and consider action regarding Zoning Case 22-Z-029 as described above. Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation Open Public Hearing Close Public Hearing Discussion Consider Action]

WE WILL NOW MOVE ON TO ITEM 13, CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDER ACTION REGARDING ZONING CASE 22 Z DASH 2 0 9, TO AMEND THE CURRENT ZONING OF INTERIM SFR.

ONE B TO HC FOUR D ON TWO PARCELS OF LAND, APPROXIMATELY NINE POINT 111 ACRES PLUS OR MINUS AND SIZE MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY WILLIAMSON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT PARKS R 0 3 1 2 8 4 AND R 3 2 4 4 49 AND MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS 29, 67 AND 35 HERO AWAY, LEANDER WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS STAFF PRESENTATION.

THANK YOU, COMMISSIONERS MICHAEL JANOSKI PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

UH, SO THIS REQUEST IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE ZONING PROCESS.

UH, THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATED ZONING DISTRICT OF THEIR PROPERTY IN ORDER TO BRING THE CURRENT, UH, USE INTO COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROPRIATE ZONING AND ADD COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS TO THE PROPERTY.

UM, SO ONE OF THE SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY A NONCONFORMING USE, UH, WHICH WAS ESTABLISHED AT THE TIME OF ANNEXATION.

ANY ADDITION OR IMPROVEMENTS OR CHANGES TO THE CURRENT USE OF THE PROPERTY DO REQUIRE A ZONING CHANGE IN ORDER TO BRING THE SITE INTO COMPLIANCE.

UH, SO THIS PROPERTY IS BOUND BY EXISTING HEAVY COMMERCIAL USERS.

UH, AND THERE ARE OTHER UNDEVELOPED PARCELS, UH, NEARBY, WHICH ARE ALSO COMMERCIALLY ZONED PROPERTIES, UH, THAT ARE NOT FULLY DEVELOPED, UH, AS COMMERCIAL USERS JUST YET.

UH, THIS PROPERTY HAS OUTDOOR STORAGE AND HAS BEEN ACTIVELY OPERATING AS A COMMERCIAL USER.

UM, UH, DEVELOPMENT MEETING WAS HELD WITH STAFF BACK IN JUNE.

UH, NO CHANGES, UH, SINCE THAT MEETING, UH, HAVE BEEN PROPOSED WITH THIS, UH, APPLICATION.

UM, SO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IDENTIFIES THIS AREA AS THE EMPLOYMENT CENTER, A AND, UH, WITHIN THE EMPLOYMENT CENTER IT'S INTENDED FOR COER COMMERCIAL USES COMPRISING 80 TO A HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE AREA.

UH, THIS PROPERTY IS AN EXISTING HEAVY COMMERCIAL USER, UH, ADJACENT TO OTHER HEAVY COMMERCIAL USERS OR INDUSTRIAL USERS.

UH, AND AS THIS PROPERTY IS REDEVELOPED, IT WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT STANDARDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HC FOUR D HEAVY COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT.

THIS INCLUDES BUILDING AND PARKING SETBACKS, OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING, AND I'LL BE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AFTER THE PUBLIC HEARING.

THANKS, SIR, WE HAVE AN APPLICANT PRESENTATION, MR. CHAIRMAN, JOHN HORTON FOR THE OWNERS.

UM, I AM OUTTA RESPECT FOR THE COMMISSION'S TIME.

I DON'T HAVE A, UH, FORMAL PRESENTATION, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO, UH, THANK THE STAFF.

THEY'VE DONE A GREAT JOB IN HELPING ME, PARTICULARLY SINCE THIS IS MY FIRST TIME THROUGH THIS PROCESS.

SO I, I APPRECIATE ALL THE, THE HELP AND, UH, AND TOLERANCE, UM, THAT SAID, UH, THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME AND SERVICE.

I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING.

ANYONE WISHING TO SPEAK IN THIS ITEM SEEING NO ONE CLOSE A PUBLIC HEARING AND WE WILL BEGIN WITH VICE CHAIRMAN.

NO QUESTIONS, NO COMMENTS.

COMMISSIONER MAY.

I'M GOOD.

COMMISSIONER MO I'M GOOD.

COMMISSIONER HAMPTON, NO QUESTIONS.

COMMISSIONER.

LANTER NO QUESTIONS.

COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.

NONE.

I HAVE NOTHING.

UM, THIS IS AN ACTION ITEM.

WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION, MOTION TO APPROVE MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER LANCER.

I'LL SECOND THAT SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? I DO ALL IN FAVOR.

ALL OPPOSED.

MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY.

IT'S BEEN A LONG DAY.

YEAH, IT'S BEEN A LONG DAY VICE CHAIR THAT MOVES US TO THE REGULAR AGENDA.

AT THIS POINT IN TIME, WE WILL CALL

[7. Approval of Subdivision Case 22-PP-007 regarding Wildspring Subdivision Preliminary Plat on one parcel of land approximately 111.57 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Williamson Central Appraisal District parcel R032112; generally located NW of the intersection of CR 177 and CR 175, Leander, Williamson County, Texas.]

ITEM NUMBER SEVEN FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA.

SO REFER TO ITEM SEVEN IN YOUR PACKET APPROVAL OF SUBDIVISION CASE 22 DASH PP DASH SEVEN REGARDING WILD SPRING SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY PLAT ON ONE PARCEL OF LAND,

[01:20:01]

APPROXIMATELY 111.57 ACRES PLUS OR MINUS AND SIGNS MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY WILLIAMSON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT PARCEL R 0 32, 112.

GENERALLY LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE INTERSECTION OF CR 1 77 AND CR 75 LEANDRA WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS, MR. DELL.

THANK YOU.

SO THIS, UH, TRACK IS ALSO KNOWN AS THE BOHO TRACK.

I BELIEVE IT CAME THROUGH WITH THE REZONING, I GUESS IT WAS A LITTLE WHILE AGO.

SO JUST FYI.

UH, THIS REQUEST IS THE SECOND STEP IN THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS PURSUANT TO SECTION TWO 12.005 WITH THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE APPROVAL BY MUNICIPALITY IS REQUIRED SINCE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT SATISFIES THE, UH, APPLICABLE REG REGULATIONS WITHOUT REQUESTING ANY VARIANCE.

UH, THE APPLICANT HERE TONIGHT IS, UH, COSTELLO, INC MR. STEVE, UH, BUFF ON BEHALF OF TOLL, UH, SOUTHWEST LLC.

UM, THIS PRELIMINARY PLA INCLUDES 326, RESIDENTIAL LOTS, EIGHT HOA SLASH PARKLAND SLASH DRAINAGE.

LIFE'S ACCESS LOTS AND ONE AMENITY CENTER.

LOT.

THE PROPOSAL INCLUDES THREE PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT.

THIS PROPOSAL MEETS ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.

STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT.

WE DO WANT TO NOTE THAT THERE WAS AN UPDATE TO THE, UH, TREE PLAN, UH, AS OUTLINED.

UM, LET'S SEE IF I CAN COVER THIS.

SO THESE ARE THE HERITAGE TREES THAT ARE TO BE REMOVED.

SOME OF THESE ARE DUE TO, UH, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, UM, AND SOME OF THEM ARE IN THE DETENTION AREA.

UM, I'LL GO SLOW.

SO YOU CAN KIND OF CHECK OUT WHERE THE HERITAGE TREES ARE.

THIS IS A LIVE OAK, UH, IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

THIS IS HERITAGE TREES IN THEIR DETENTION AREA.

I BELIEVE.

UH, THESE ARE ALSO SCHEDULED TO BE REMOVED AND THEN THERE'S SOME OVER HERE, UH, AS WELL.

SO AS THEY'RE, UH, THEY'RE PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED, UH, TODAY WITH THE PRELIMINARY PLATS, WHEN THEY ARE LAYING OUT, UH, THE SUBDIVISION IN FULL WITH THE FINAL PLAT, THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, ET CETERA, THEY WILL, UH, TRY THEIR BEST TO MAYBE PRESERVE SOME OF THESE HERITAGE TREES.

UM, SO WE JUST WANTED TO NOTE THAT THERE'S ALSO, UH, POTENTIALLY SOME, UH, I CAN'T ZOOM IN ON IT, BUT, UH, THERE MIGHT BE SOME, UH, ROAD WORK DONE ON THIS ROAD HERE.

UH, I'M SORRY, I DON'T KNOW THE ROAD OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD, CUZ I CAN'T SEE WHAT IT IS.

UH, SO IF THEY DO ANY CONSTRUCTION, UH, AT THE TIME THAT THEY'RE COMING THROUGH WITH, I BELIEVE THIS IS PHASE ONE, UH, THEN THEY'LL ADDRESS THAT, THAT TREE MITIGATION AT THAT TIME AS WELL.

SO THERE'S A NOTE ADDED TO THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, UH, AS OF TODAY THE UPDATED VERSION.

SO, UH, WITH THAT SAID THE APPLICANT IS HERE, UH, FOR ANY QUESTIONS, UH, AS WELL AS STAFF.

SO THANK YOU.

OKAY.

WE'LL ENTER INTO DISCUSSION SINCE THIS IS A REGULAR AGENDA ITEM AND NOT A PUBLIC HEARING.

UM, COMMISSIONER CARPENTER, NO QUESTIONS, COMMISSIONER LANDR NO QUESTIONS.

COMMISSIONER HAMPTON.

UM, I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, BUT JUST, UM, HIGHLY ENCOURAGED THAT ROADWAY BEING LOOKED AT AND WORKED ON THAT'S ALL COMMISSIONER MOSS, UH, FREQUENT COMMISSIONER HAMPTON.

THAT'S THE ROADWAYS NEED TO BE SERIOUSLY WORKED ON THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER MAY I'M GOOD.

VICE CHAIRMAN.

I'M GOOD.

SO, SO MY, MY ONLY QUESTION FOR STAFF IS, IS SO WE DON'T REALLY KNOW HOW MANY INCHES ARE, ARE GOING TO BE REMOVED DEPENDING ON, ON WHAT HAPPENS WITH THE ROAD OR ON THE, THERE THERE'S A POSSIBILITY THAT THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT MIGHT LOOK FOR THAT CURVE TO BE SMOOTHED OUT.

AND THAT'S WHEN WE'LL FIND OUT WHAT'S REQUIRED AND WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN.

OKAY.

YEAH, BUT THAT, BUT THE APPLICANT WILL STILL BE REQUIRED IF THEY HAVE TO MITIGATE THE, IF THEY HAVE TO REMOVE THE TREES, THEY'LL RE WILL THEY BE REQUIRED TO, TO MITIGATE PER ORDINANCE TYPICALLY, UM, IF IT BECOMES A CITY PROJECT THAT MIGHT BE A DIFFERENT SCENARIO, BUT IT'S SOMETHING WE'LL EVALUATE WHEN WE GET THERE.

THE CITY HAS TO MITIGATE AS WELL.

SO YEAH, YEAH, YEAH, YEAH.

I'M THERE.

THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT.

THIS IS AN ACTION ITEM.

DO I HAVE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE THE MOTION TO APPROVE.

HAVE A MOTION TO PROVE BY COMMISSIONER MAY I'LL SECOND.

I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER MOSS, ALL IN FAVOR.

ALL OPPOSED MOTION.

CARRIE UNANIMOUSLY

[01:25:07]

BRINGS US TO

[14. Discuss and consider action regarding Subdivision Case 22-PP-004 to approve the Bar W Ranch West Phases 10 and 11 Preliminary Plat on six parcels of land approximately 94.5 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Williamson Central Appraisal District Parcels R544598, R532728, R539735, R539738, R573683, R544612; generally located northeast of CR 267 and Bar W Ranch Blvd. Leander, Williamson County, Texas. Staff Presentation Discussion Consider Action]

I NUMBER 14, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION REGARDING SUBDIVISION CASE 22 DASH PP DASH ZERO FOUR.

TO APPROVE THE BAR W RANCH WEST PHASES, 10 AND 11 PRELIMINARY PLATINUM SIX PARCELS OF LAND, APPROXIMATELY 94.5 ACRES PLUS OR MINUS AND SIZE MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY WILLIAMSON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT PARCELS R 5 4 4 5 9 8 R 5 3 2 7 28 R 5 3 9 7 3 5 R 5 3 9 7 3 8 R 5 7 3 6 8 3 R 5 4 4 602.

GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF CR 2 67 AND BAR W RANCH BOULEVARD, LE ANDREW WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS STAFF PRESENTATION EVENING COMMISSIONERS MICHAEL CHENOWSKI PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

UH, SO THIS REQUEST IS THE SECOND STEP IN THE SUBDIVISION PROCESS.

AND PURSUANT TWO SECTION 2, 1 2 0.005 OF THE TEXAS LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE APPROVAL BY THE MUNICIPALITY IS REQUIRED SINCE THIS PRELIMINARY PLA SATISFIES THE APPLICABLE REGULATIONS WITHOUT REQUESTING ANY VARIANCES.

UH, THIS PRELIMINARY PLA INCLUDES 321 SINGLE FAMILY, LOTS NINE LANDSCAPE, LOTS, ONE HOA PARK, PARKLAND, LOT, ONE CEMETERY, LOT.

UH, THIS REQUEST ALSO INCLUDES THE REMOVAL OF 10 HERITAGE TREES TOTALLING 323 INCHES, UH, FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY.

THIS PROJECT IS PRESERVING 80% OF EXISTING HERITAGE TREES, UH, ON SITE TOTALLING 1,298 PRESERVED HERITAGE TREE INCHES AND APPROXIMATELY 71% OF ALL OTHER SIGNIFICANT TREES ON SITE.

UH, THIS PROPOSAL MEETS ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE.

THE BAR W RANCH, UH, MUD AGREEMENT ALLOWS FOR 25% MITIGATION REDUCTION FOR REMOVAL OF INVASIVE SPECIES, UH, WHICH THEY ARE ALSO DOING.

UH, THE FINAL MITIGATION FEE FOR THE HERITAGE TREE REMOVAL FEE, UH, WOULD BE $96,800.

AND THAT'S DUE AT THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT SET.

IF ALL THE INCHES ARE THE SAME, UM, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLA THANK YOU, SIR.

WE WILL ENTER IN DISCUSSION VICE CHAIR.

I'M GOOD.

COMMISSIONER MAY I'M GOOD.

COMMISSIONER MOSS.

I'M GOOD.

COMMISSIONER HAMPTON.

GOOD COMMISSIONER OLAN.

NO QUESTIONS.

COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.

NO QUESTIONS.

I HAVE NO QUESTIONS.

THIS IS AN ACTION ITEM.

WE'LL ENTERTAIN A MOTION MOTION TO APPROVE MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MAY I'LL SECOND SECOND BY VICE CHAIR.

MA'AM ALL IN FAVOR.

OPPOSED.

MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY BRINGS

[15. Discuss and consider action on Tree Removal Case 22-TRP-006 regarding removal of a Significant Tree associated with the Brushy Creek Retail Floodplain Development Project, generally located at US 183 and Metro Dr. Leander, Williamson County, Texas. Staff Presentation Applicant Presentation Discussion Consider Action]

US TO ITEM 15, DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON TREE REMOVAL CASE 22 DASH T RRP DASH 0 0 6 REGARDING REMOVAL OF A SIGNIFICANT TREE RE ASSOCIATED WITH THE BRUSHY CREEK RETAIL FLOOD PLAIN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT GENERALLY LOCATED AT US 180 3 AND METRO DRIVE LEANDRA WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS STAFF PRESENTATION.

SO THIS REQUEST IS THE FINAL STEP IN THE TREE REMOVAL, UH, REQUEST PROCESS.

UH, THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED THE REQUEST TO REMOVE ONE SIGNIFICANT TREE, UH, 21 INCH AMERICAN ELM, UH, DUE TO SITE GRADING NEEDED FOR IMPROVED DRAINAGE AND LATER SITE DEVELOPMENT, UH, PER THE COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE, ARTICLE SIX, SECTION ONE C REMOVAL OF A SIGNIFICANT TREE GREATER THAN 18 INCH CALIPER, UH, REQUIRES APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, UH, OR AN ALTERNATE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN, UM, WHERE APPLICABLE.

UH, SO THE SURROUNDING AREA, THIS PROPERTY IS BOUND BY, UH, US 180 3 AND THE CAPITAL METRO, UH, RAILROAD, UH, ON THE, UH, EAST SIDE, UH, S 180 3 ON THE WEST SIDE.

UH, THE PROPERTY IS NEAR THE CAP METRO STATION AND THE NORTHLINE DEVELOPMENT AS THE PROPERTY WE JUST SAW EARLIER IS RIGHT HERE, UM, FOR REFERENCE, UH, THIS PROPERTY CONTAINS SIGNIFICANT AND LET'S SEE WHAT YOU GOT THERE.

UH, SIGNIFICANT DRAINAGE CONCERNS, UH, DUE TO THE PROXIMITY OF THE FLOOD.

PLAIN, PRIOR TO THE TREE REMOVAL REQUEST, THE APPLICANT HAD SUBMITTED A FLOOD PLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, UH, TO CORRECT THAT GRADING AND DRAINAGE, UH, IN ORDER TO ADDRESS SOME OF THOSE ISSUES.

UH, DURING THAT PROCESS, THAT'S WHEN WE NOTED, UH, THE TREE, UH, THAT WAS IN QUESTION, UH, THIS PROJECT WOULD TAKE ACCESS OFF OF US.

180 3.

UH, THE COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS UP TO 50% OF SIGNIFICANT TREES BETWEEN EIGHT AND 18 INCHES, UH, MAY BE REMOVED WITHOUT MITIGATION TREES, 18 TO 26 REQUIRE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVAL AND TREES OVER 26 INCHES REQUIRE COMMISSION AND COUNCIL APPROVAL, UH, AS PART OF THE MITIGATION PROCESS FOR

[01:30:01]

THE FLOOD PLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, THE APPLICANT AND THE CITY WILL ENTER INTO A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.

UH, THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WILL ALLOW MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS INCURRED DURING THE FLOOD PLAIN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS TO BE DELAYED UNTIL THE SITE DEVELOPMENT STAGE.

AND ALTHOUGH MITIGATION, UH, OF REPLACEMENT INCHES OR USE OF TREE CREDIT WILL BE DELAYED AT THIS TIME.

REMOVAL OF THE, UH, 21 INCH, UH, AMERICAN ELM, UH, REQUIRES COMMISSION APPROVAL AND I'LL BE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU, SIR.

WE'LL ENTER INTO DISCUSSION COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.

WHAT CAN THEY DEVELOP ON THIS SITE? ISN'T THIS BASICALLY A, A BOULEVARD.

UM, IT WOULD BE REALLY TIGHT, UM, BUT THEY CAN, UM, RIGHT NOW I THINK IT'S ZONED AS CONVENTIONAL DEVELOPMENT.

UM, WE DON'T HAVE THAT SLED.

SO, SO THIS IS BETWEEN, BETWEEN THE RAILROAD LINES AND 180 3.

RIGHT? RIGHT.

SO I THINK THIS IS A HARD ONE BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE THE, THE REAL ZONING YET.

CUZ CONVENTIONAL DEVELOPMENT SECTOR IS LIKE A HOLDING CATEGORY.

SO THEY HAVEN'T COME IN WITH AN APPLICATION TO CHANGE IT TO COMMERCIAL.

I WOULD HAVE A HARD TIME REMOVING TREES FROM A SITE THAT WE HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THEY'RE GONNA DO TO, OR IF ANYTHING CAN EVEN BE DONE TO THAT SITE.

MM-HMM SO, I MEAN, WHY DON'T WE JUST LEAVE IT ALONE AND WAIT TILL SOMEBODY WANTS TO DO SOMETHING WITH IT? I MEAN, IT CAN'T BE JUST FOR DRAINAGE.

CAUSE I, I THINK THEY'RE TRYING TO PREPARE IT FOR DEVELOPMENT.

THEY'RE THEY'RE TRYING TO DO A FLOOD PLAIN DEVELOPMENT AND GET IT READY TO TRY TO SELL IT TO DEVELOP, BUT YOU YOU'RE NOT.

WELL I'M SURE THEY'D LIKE OUR ASSISTANCE TO GET THAT DONE.

I'M SORRY.

I, I REALLY, I HAVE A HARD TIME WITH TREES GOING OUT FOR NO GOOD REASON.

I HAD A HARD TIME DOING IT FOR GOOD REASON BEFORE.

SO YOU KNOW, NOW, NOW WE'VE GOT NO GOOD REASON AND WE'RE GONNA DO IT, SO, OKAY.

THAT'S MINE.

COMMISSIONER ELECTRIC.

NO QUESTION COMMISSION HAND, NO QUESTIONS.

COMMISSIONER WALLACE.

I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, BUT I AGREE WITH COMMISSIONER CARPENTER 2000% COMMISSIONER, MAY I HAVE NOTHING? VICE CHAIR.

I'M GOOD.

I'M GOOD.

OKAY.

SEE IN ACTION THERE, I THAT'S YOUR MOTION.

UM, I'D LIKE TO, UM, MAKE THE MOTION TO HOLD OFF TO YOU, LIKE ACTUALLY GONNA DO SOMETHING WITH YOU.

SO YOU MAKING A MOTION TO DENY.

YES.

I HAVE A MOTION TO DENY BY COMMISSIONER MOSS.

DO I HAVE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND THAT I HAVE A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER CARPENTER.

ALL IN FAVOR.

ALL OPPOSED.

TERRY UNANIMOUSLY MOTION IS DENIED.

THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM 16,

[16. Discuss and consider action on the Planning & Zoning Commission Progress Report for September 2021 to August 2022.]

DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PROGRESS REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER 21 TO AUGUST, 2022 .

SO STAFF HAS PREPARED A PROGRESS REPORT BASED ON THE ACTIVITY, UM, WITH THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION DURING THE, UM, LAST FISCAL YEAR, UM, PER OUR CHARTER, WE PRESENT THIS TO THE CITY COUNCIL, UM, IN OCTOBER AND UM, I GUESS IF Y'ALL HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW IT AND HAVE ANY COMMENTS, LET ME KNOW WE CAN MAKE UPDATES OR IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS WE CAN GO FROM THERE.

YEAH.

I ALMOST DIED AND TRAVEL A LOT.

NICE CHAIR.

SO ON THE, ON ATTACHMENT ONE, YOU HAVE THE ABSENCE PERCENTAGE FOR COMMISSIONERS CARPENTER AND HINES AT A HUNDRED PERCENT.

IT ACTUALLY SHOULD BE 0%.

THAT IS CORRECT.

YES.

THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT, HEY DAVID, OTHER THAN THAT, IT LOOKS GOOD.

THANKS.

THANK YOU.

YOU'RE WELCOME.

IS THIS STILL I, IS THIS 2020? IS THIS A BEFORE? YES.

YEAR BEFORE.

OH, OKAY.

ON THIS LAST YEAR.

OKAY.

YEAH.

OKAY.

OKAY.

SO WE PROVED THAT ONE LAST YEAR.

OKAY.

DETAILS.

OKAY.

THEY NEVER BEST .

I HAVE A QUESTION.

SO ANY, YES.

I HAVE A QUESTION FOR, UH, ROBIN MS. GRIFFIN, UM, DO Y'ALL HAVE AN OPINION ON THE, UH, ITEMS THAT THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE APPROVED AND THE CITY COUNCIL HAS, UH, LOADED AGAINST Y'ALL HAVE ANY LIKE DO Y'ALL COME HOW'S THAT WORK? LIKE I KNOW YOU KIND OF HAVE IT IN HERE, BUT DO Y'ALL HAVE LIKE OPINIONS ON THAT? LIKE YEAH.

UM, I MEAN WE

[01:35:01]

CAN KIND OF TALK THROUGH IT.

UM, ARE YOU SAYING NO, I GO IT'S UP TO YOU.

OH, IT'S IT'S UP TO YOU.

WELL, IT IT'S, YOU DON'T HAVE TO.

SO I'M TRYING TO SAY UP TO, UM, WHEN YOU, WHEN YOU LOOK AT IT, YOU CAN SEE, UM, THERE ARE DIFFERENT THINGS IN PLACE.

SO THE, THE COMMISSION SOMETIMES HAS A DIFFERENT ROLE WHERE Y'ALL ARE LOOKING AT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND LAND USE AND YOU'RE LISTENING TO THE PUBLIC.

AND THEN THE COUNCIL HAS, UM, MORE THINGS THAT THEY HAVE TO LOOK AT.

SO SOMETIMES THEY'LL IMPLEMENT DIFFERENT POLICIES.

SO YOU'LL SEE CHANGES LIKE THAT.

AND YOU CAN ALSO SEE EVOLUTION LIKE, UM, HOW WE'VE GROWN AND PROGRESSED BETWEEN MEETINGS.

AND I KNOW THAT SOUNDS WEIRD, BUT, BUT THINGS HAPPEN.

SOMETIMES THE APPLICANT COMES IN, THERE WAS ONE CASE WHERE THE COMMISSION WANTED THEM TO MAKE CHANGES AND THEY SAID NOT DOING ANYTHING.

AND THEN BETWEEN COMMISSION AND COUNCIL, THEY DID MAKE THE CHANGES.

SO THEN COUNCIL APPROVED IT.

SO THERE ARE THINGS LIKE THAT, THAT HAPPEN.

Y'ALL AREN'T ALWAYS GONNA AGREE.

RIGHT? I THINK IT'S, IT IT'S FAIR THAT WE HAVE A VERY NARROW FOCUS MM-HMM AND, AND THEY HAVE A VERY BROAD FOCUS.

SO THAT, THAT COULD, THAT I THINK THAT PROBABLY OFTEN HAS A LOT TO DO WITH IT IF THEY WERE, IF THEY WERE MAKING DECISIONS STRICTLY ON JOINING TOO, THEY'D PROBABLY THINK THINGS A LOT MORE AND GOING ON WHAT WE DO, ANYBODY ELSE, I, I JUST WANTED TO TAG ONTO THAT.

I THINK THAT ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'VE DONE OVER THE PAST COUPLE YEARS, THAT'S BEEN REALLY GOOD IS ADDING IN THAT EXTRA MEETING IN BETWEEN.

AND I THINK IT WAS AS A RESULT OF ALL THE CHANGES BETWEEN P AND Z AND COUNCIL, WHERE WE WOULD EITHER APPROVE OR DENY SOMETHING TO P AND Z AND SOMETHING TOTALLY DIFFERENT, WHICH SHOW UP TO COUNCIL.

UM, AND SO THIS ADDITIONAL MEETING GIVES US TIME TO GIVE COMMENTS AND DEVELOPERS TIME TO COME BACK WITH ADJUSTMENTS.

NO, I THINK, I THINK THAT, THAT THAT'S REALLY TRUE.

I REMEMBER THE DAYS WHERE WE WOULD SIT AND LOOK AT EACH OTHER AND SAY, I DIDN'T SEE THAT , I'VE NEVER SEEN THAT BEFORE IN MY LIFE.

AND, AND IT'S UP IN FRONT OF COUNCIL.

YOU DON'T, THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN ANYMORE.

AND I THINK THAT'S A GOOD THING.

ANYTHING ELSE? IF WE HAVE NOTHING ELSE, WE STAND ADJOURNED AT 8 37.