[00:00:01]
DIDN'T KNOW THAT WAS A THING.THAT'S WHAT THE LAW WAS WHEN I WAS, IF YOU HAVE THE TIME IS 6:00 PM AND THIS MEETING IS THE CITY OF LEANDER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION WILL COME TO ORDER.
LET THE RECORD SHOW THAT ALL COMMISSIONERS ARE PRESENT, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF COMMISSIONER AND CHAIR OLIVER, WHICH IS WHY I'M SITTING HERE THIS EVENING.
[3. Director's report to the Planning & Zoning Commission on action taken by City Council on the January 2, 2025 meeting.]
UM, DIRECTOR'S REPORT ITEM NUMBER THREE, MS. GRIFFIN.I'M REPORTING ON ITEMS THAT WERE, UM, FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION FROM THE JANUARY 2ND MEETING.
UM, THE COUNCIL DID CONDUCT THE SECOND READING OF THE PIONEER FARMSTEAD, UM, JANUARY 2ND, AND IT'S BEEN A WHILE SINCE THE UM, COMMISSION HAS SEEN THAT ITEM.
THEY DID REMOVE ALL OF THE RESIDENTIALS, SO THEIR ZONING CASE FOCUSED ON THE COMMERCIAL PORTION.
UM, THEY ALSO REVIEWED THE, UM, PAG LEANDER AMENDMENT TWO, UM, AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.
SO THEY'LL HAVE THE SECOND READING ON THE NEXT AGENDA.
AND THEN THEY, UM, REVIEWED THE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES PLAN, UH, OR ORDINANCE AMENDMENT AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL.
I NEED TO MAKE A CORRECTION ALREADY.
UH, COMMISSIONER MAHAN IS ALSO NOT HERE THIS EVENING, SO THE RECORDS SHOW THAT COMMISSIONER MAHAN AND COMMISSIONER OLIVER ARE NOT HERE.
[4. Review of meeting protocol.]
UH, ITEM NUMBER FOUR, REVIEW OF MEETING PROTOCOL.ON THE SCREEN TO YOUR RIGHT IS HOW WE RUN OUR MEETINGS.
YOU HAVE ANY, ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT? THE ANSWERS WILL BE ON THAT SCREEN.
[5. Public comments on items not listed in the agenda.
Public comments on items listed in the agenda will be heard at the time each item is discussed.
[All comments are limited to no more than 3 minutes (6 minutes if translation is needed) per individual.]]
IS THERE ANYONE HERE THIS EVENING THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON ANYTHING THAT IS NOT ON THIS EVENING'S AGENDA? OKAY.
[ CONSENT AGENDA: ACTION]
NONE, WE'LL MOVE TO, UH, THE CONSENT AGENDA.ITEM SIX, SEVEN, AND EIGHT CAN BE PASSED WITH A SINGLE MOTION.
[9. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider action regarding Comprehensive Plan Case CPA-24-0015 to amend the Comprehensive Plan land use category from Employment Center to Neighborhood Residential and to conduct a Public Hearing and consider action regarding Zoning Case Z-24-0147 to amend the current zoning of Interim SFR-1-B (Single-Family Rural) to SFE-2-A (Single-Family Estate) on one (1) parcel of land approximately 20.536 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Williamson Central Appraisal District Parcel R392186; and generally located east of CR 175, approximately 250 feet north of Carthage Street, Leander, Williamson County, Texas.
]
MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER NINE.
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ACTION REGARDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CASE CPA DASH 24 0 0 1 5 TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PLANNED LAND USE CATEGORY FROM EMPLOYMENT CENTER TO NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL, AND TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER SINGLE ACT.
CONSIDER ACTION REGARDING ZONING CASE Z DASH 24 DASH 0 1 4 7 TO AMEND THE CURRENT ZONING OF INTERIM S FFR ONE B, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL TO SFE TWO, A SINGLE FAMILY ESTATE, UH, WITH THE REST AS DESCRIBED, UH, IN THE AGENDA HERE.
UH, STAFF PRESENTATION, GOOD EVENING COMMISSION, KARINA CASTILLO.
UM, SO THIS IS TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON TWO CASES.
IT IS A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AMENDMENT AND THE ZONING CASE.
AND THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATED FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY AND THE ZONING DISTRICT OF THEIR PROPERTY IN ORDER TO DEVELOP A LARGE LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT.
AND THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A PETITION FOR ANNEXATION OF THIS TRACK AS WELL.
THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO THE ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT THAT REQUIRES THAT THE PROPERTY IS ANNEXED INTO THE CITY LIMITS WHEN REDEVELOPED WHEN REDEVELOPMENT IS PROPOSED.
THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED THE ANNEXATION REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND IT MUST BE APPROVED BEFORE THE ZONING REQUEST MAY BE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
THE RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THIS ANNEXATION IS SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD ON THE MARCH 6TH.
UM, SO I'M SORRY, THE RESOLUTION IS FEBRUARY 6TH AND THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE ON MARCH 6TH.
UM, THE RESOLUTION THAT WAS ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IN OCTOBER OF 22 THAT LIMIT THE CON LIMIT CONSIDERATION OF ZONING REQUEST TO SEEK TO ADD RESIDENTIAL LOTS.
UM, THIS RESOLUTION PRIORITIZES LARGE LOT LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT SUCH AS S-F-R-S-F-E AND SFS.
AND THE APPLICANT HAS PRESENTED A DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL REVIEW FOR THIS REQUEST.
DURING THE JULY 18TH, 2024 MEETING, UM, THE CITY COUNCIL SUPPORTED THE PROPOSAL REGARDING THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOCATED NORTH OF THE INTERSECTION OF 1 75 AND CARTHAGE STREET.
UM, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED, I'M GONNA PULL UP THE AREA HERE.
UM, IT IS LOCATED EAST OF 1 75 AND NORTH OF THE EDGEWOOD SUBDIVISION.
TO THE WEST OF THE SIDE IS THE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE.
THE AREAS THAT ARE TO THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH ARE MOSTLY UNDEVELOPED.
THERE'S THE GREEN, UM, GRASS PATCH.
INK IS LOCATED DIRECTLY TO THE EAST OF THE SIDE AND LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS.
AND LET'S SEE WHAT ELSE WE HAVE.
THE CITY COUNCIL HEARD THAT DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE SITE FROM THE EMPLOYMENT CENTER TO RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL, NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL AND VOTED TO SUPPORT THE REQUEST.
SO THE REQUEST FOR SFE TWO A IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE PROPOSED NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
THE DENSITY IS ALSO CONSISTENT WITH THE WATER RESOLUTION ORDINANCE, WHICH PRIORITIZES LARGE LOT RESIDENTIAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTIAL FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY.
SO STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF BOTH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND THE ZONING, UM, ZONING REQUEST
[00:05:01]
CONTINGENT ON THE ANNEXATION BEING APPROVED.SO THERE WILL BE A DELAY ON THE ADOPTION OF THE ZONING CASE, BUT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WILL PROCEED WITH THE SCHEDULE THAT WAS POSTED.
AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE WITH A PRESENTATION, APPLICANT PRESENTATION.
MY NAME IS JOSH BECKER AND I'M THE APPLICANT.
UH, KARINA COVERED MOST OF IT, LIKE SHE MENTIONED.
WE, UM, BROUGHT THIS BEFORE COUNCIL JUST TO KIND OF GET THEIR PULSE.
WE PURCHASED THIS LAND A LITTLE OVER A YEAR AGO WITH THE INTENT TO BRING IT IN AS EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT AND AS WE'VE BEEN, UM, COMMUTING BACK AND FORTH TO THE SITE, IT, IT QUICKLY BECAME APPARENT THAT IT WOULD BE A LITTLE BIT TRAGIC TO, TO CLEAR IT FOR COMMERCIAL USE.
AND SO WE, WE PROPOSED TO COUNSEL THE IDEA OF TAKING IT TO LARGE LOT RESIDENTIAL.
UM, THIS IS THE, A PRELIMINARY LAYOUT THAT WE'VE COME UP WITH.
OBVIOUSLY THERE'S GONNA NEED TO BE SOME CHANGES AS WE GO THROUGH IT WITH ENGINEERING, ET CETERA.
BUT THIS WAS THE, THE PRETTIEST REPRESENTATION WE HAD.
UM, IT'S 20 ACRES LOCATED AS WAS MENTIONED, JUST EAST OF COUNTY ROAD 1 75 AND JUST NORTH OF, UM, WILD, WILD LEAF SUBDIVISION.
UM, THERE'S A TOLL BROTHERS DEVELOPMENT, I DON'T KNOW WHAT IT'S CALLED, UM, ALSO JUST SOUTH OF US.
AND THEN PARKSIDE ON THE RIVER, OBVIOUSLY JUST EAST OF US.
EVERYTHING UP ALONG 2243 IS UNDEVELOPED.
UM, AND I THINK WAITING TO BE DEVELOPED AS THEY LOOK AT PROPOSALS TO, UM, TO WIDEN 180 3 AND CONNECT IT TO HERO WAY, ET CETERA.
SO THIS IS THE CURRENT, UM, FUTURE LAND USE PLAN.
DOES THIS HAVE A POINTER? YEAH, THERE WE GO.
IS THIS LITTLE OFFSHOOT OF THE RESIDENCE OF THE, UM, COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT CENTER.
AND SO OUR PROPOSAL WOULD JUST KIND OF CUT THIS LITTLE SECTION THAT GOES DOWN TO 1 75 AND REMOVE IT AND TAKE IT RESIDENTIAL, YOU KNOW, CONSISTENT WITH THE AREAS TO THE NORTH AND TO THE SOUTH EXCEPT LARGER LOT.
SO, UM, THIS IS THE CURRENT STATE OF THE PROPERTY.
THERE'S JUST A LOT OF REALLY BIG TREES.
AND THEN TOPOGRAPHY WISE, IT'S A REALLY, REALLY PRETTY SITE.
IF YOU EVER HAVE A CHANCE TO GO OUT THERE, IT'S VERY PRETTY.
BUT, UM, THERE'S A RESIDENTIAL HOME ON IT RIGHT NOW, AND THEN WE'D LOOK AT PUTTING IN APPROXIMATELY 40 TO 45 LARGE LOTS.
SO, UM, IF YOU HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS, OBVIOUSLY I'M HEARING CAN ANSWER WHATEVER, BUT UM, THAT'S ALL I GOT.
OKAY, AT THIS TIME I'LL OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? OKAY, SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ENTER INTO DISCUSSION, UH, AS AN ACTION ITEM.
UH, MY ONLY QUESTION IS DID THE REACH OUT TO THE NEIGHBORS AROUND IT AND I GUESS MOSTLY THE ONES TO THE EAST AND THE SOUTH THAT ARE GONNA BE SANDWICHED IN BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL.
YOU KNOW, I DIDN'T KNOW IF THEY HAD OTHER VISIONS FOR THEIR PROPERTY AND, YOU KNOW, KIND OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
AND IF WE, THE CITY DOES AND THE THE COMMISSION UPDATES THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, YOU KNOW, IT KIND OF MAKES SENSE THAT THEY WOULD GET LUMPED IN WITH THIS CHANGE TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
THEY DO HAVE TO SUBMIT THAT REQUEST.
UM, IF WE DID INITIATE IT, IT IS A LONGER PROCESS FOR US.
WE DO HAVE TO GET ALL THE PROPERTY OWNERS TO SIGN OFF ON IT AND WE DO CHANGE THE CATEGORIES.
UM, BUT WE COULD ALWAYS CONSIDER IT AT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WHEN WE REDO THE, THE MAP.
IT'S, IT DOES SEEM APPROPRIATE, BUT YEAH, IT DOES PUT A COUPLE PROPERTIES IN A SET, A UNIQUE PRECEDENT THAT THEY'RE GONNA, THEY COULD, THEY'RE TECHNICALLY STILL DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IF THOSE OWN PROPERTY OWNERS WANT WANTED TO GO A DIFFERENT WAY.
BUT OVERALL, I LIKE, I LIKE THE, LIKE IT AND THINK IT IS PERFECT.
I HAVE, I HAVE SPOKEN WITH HE'S PLEASE COME UP TO THE MICROPHONE.
YEAH, I HAVE SPOKEN WITH THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, BOTH OF 'EM, JESSE'S ACROSS THE STREET AND I WENT AND SAT DOWN WITH HIM AND HIS SON AND THEN JUST TO THE NORTH OF US.
UM, I'VE SPOKEN WITH THEM AS WELL AND THEY'RE BOTH, NEITHER ONE HAD
[00:10:01]
INTEREST IN LIKE COMING IN AND, AND GOING THROUGH THE PROCESS, BUT BOTH WERE VERY, VERY SUPPORTIVE OF WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO, SO.UH, IF YOU COULD COME UP TO THE MICROPHONE PLEASE.
WE'LL HAVE TO GET A SIGN UP CARD FOR ME FROM YOU AS WELL AFTERWARDS.
WELL, NO, I WAS JUST GONNA SAY I TALK.
STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD AND YOUR ADDRESS.
AND I LIVE IN THE, I I HAVE THE PROPERTY DIRECTLY NEXT TO, I GUESS THAT WOULD BE NORTH.
AND SO I GUESS, I DON'T KNOW HOW IS THIS GONNA AFFECT ME? THE ZONING, THE REZONING, IT SHOULDN'T AFFECT RIGHT AT THIS POINT WE CAN'T REALLY HAVE A BACK AND FORTH WITH, WITH PUBLIC COMMENTARY.
BUT KARINA CAN, SO WE'VE ALREADY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING MM-HMM
UM, BUT UM, THEY WOULDN'T AFFECT THE, THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES FOR THEM TO REDEVELOP.
SO THEY WOULD STILL HAVE, UM, THEY ARE IN THE CITY, SO THEY WOULD HAVE THEIR BAY ZONING ALREADY.
UM, THEY WOULD NEED TO COME BACK FOR A REZONE WHENEVER THEY WANT TO REDEVELOP.
UM, BUT THIS DOES NOT IMPACT THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY.
IT DOES NOT CHANGE ANYTHING ON THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY.
SO IF THEY WANTED TO REDEVELOP LATER, THEY ARE UNDER EMPLOYMENT CENTER, SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO, UM, DEVELOP IT AS COMMERCIAL, BUT THEY CAN ALWAYS COME BACK AND MAKE THAT REQUEST JUST LIKE, UM, THIS APPLICANT DID.
COMMISSIONER MAY, THE ONE QUESTION I HAVE IS THE HOT BUTTON FOR P AND Z IN THE PAST, UH, WHERE ALLOWED SO MANY RESIDENTIAL LOTS WITHIN AN EMPLOYMENT CENTER.
AND WHAT DOES THAT DO TO OUR PERCENTAGES OVERALL? FOR THIS, THIS WOULD BE REMOVING IT FROM THE EMPLOYMENT CENTER, SO IT WOULD NOT BE IN HERE.
IS THAT IT? COMMISSIONER LADAY DAY? NO QUESTIONS FOR ME.
COMMISSIONER LANDRUM? UM, I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.
I'M IN SUPPORT OF THE, UH, THE APPLICATION.
I GUESS MY ONE COMMENT WOULD BE BACK WHEN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS DONE LAST TIME, I FELT THAT THE EMPLOYMENT CENTER WAS NOT REALLY SUITABLE FOR THIS AREA ANYWAY, THAT IT WENT A LITTLE TOO FAR INTO THE RESIDENTIAL, UH, EVEN THOUGH IT WAS INTERIM ZONING, THAT IT WENT A LITTLE TOO FAR THAT WAY.
SO I'M ACTUALLY IN FAVOR OF THIS.
YOU KNOW, MY ONLY CONCERN WOULD BE IF, IF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN STAYS AS IT IS, THEN WE HAVE THIS NEIGHBORHOOD OF PEOPLE WHO'S GONNA COME BEFORE US.
ANYTIME ANYBODY TRIES TO DEVELOP BUSINESS AROUND THEM IN THE EMPLOYMENT CENTER AND SAY, YOU KNOW, WELL WE DON'T WANT THAT BUSINESS BEHIND US.
SO YOU KNOW THAT THAT'S THE ONLY THING THAT WE'LL HAVE TO DEAL WITH AT THE TIME.
BUT THAT MAY BE SOMETHING WE CAN ADDRESS IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW.
UH, THIS IS, THAT ENDS THE DISCUSSION.
MOTION TO APPROVE? I'LL SECOND.
MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER LANTRIP.
WHAT? IT'S ACTUALLY TWO ACTIONS.
OH, ITEMS. SO YOU HAVE TO DO THE COMP PLAN FIRST.
MY MOTION WAS FOR THE COMP PLAN.
SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LADAY.
AND MY SECOND WAS TO THE COMP PLAN.
ALL IN FAVOR PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
UH, ACTION ITEM FOR DISCUSSING CONSIDER ACTION REGARDING THE ZONING CASE.
UM, DO I HAVE A MOTION ON THAT? MOTION TO APPROVE? MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MORALES.
ALL IN FAVOR PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
[10. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider action regarding Zoning Case Z-24-0137 to amend the current zoning of PAG Leander H1 PUD (Planned Unit Development) with a base zoning district of GC-4-A (General Commercial) to allow for an automobile dealership with unlimited outdoor storage without a primary structure on one (1) parcel of land approximately 6.592 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Williamson Central Appraisal District Parcel R578129; and legally described as Lot 1, Block A of the PAG Leander H1 Subdivision, Leander, Williamson County, Texas. Applicant/Agent: Penske Automotive Group (Jeff Anderson) on behalf of PAG West, LLC. (George Raysik).
]
CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ACTION REGARDING ZONING CASE Z DASH 24 DASH 0 1 3 7.
TO AMEND THE PAG LAND LEANDER H ONE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WITH A BASE ZONING DISTRICT OF GC FOUR, A GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO ALLOW FOR AN AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP WITH UNLIMITED OUTDOOR STORAGE WITH WITHOUT A PRIMARY STRUCTURE ON LOT ONE BLOCK A OF THE PAG LANDER, H LEANDER, H ONE, SUBDIVISION ONE AS DESCRIBED IN THE REST OF THE AGENDA HERE.
SO AGAIN, THIS IS TO DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON ZONING CASE Z 24 1 3 7.
THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO AMEND THE P IN ORDER TO ALLOW FOR VEHICLE PARKING FOR AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIPS TO OCCUR ON A LOT WITHOUT A PRIMARY BUILDING.
THE REQUEST ALSO RESERVES THE CORNER LOT FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED JUST NORTH OF THE EXISTING AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP, WHICH WAS APPROVED WITH THE ORIGINAL PHG LEANER H ONE PUD.
THE COMPOSITE ZONING ORDINANCE
[00:15:01]
CLASSIFIES VEHICLES FROM THE AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIP AS OUTDOOR DISPLAY.THE TYPE FOUR SITE COMPONENT ALLOW ALLOWS OUTDOOR DISPLAY WHEN LOCATED ON THE SAME SITE AS A PERMANENT BUSINESS THAT IT IS ASSOCIATED WITH.
THIS REQUEST IS TO ALLOW FOR THE VEHICLE INVENTORY PARKING ASSOCIATED WITH THAT TO OCCUR ON A LOT WITHOUT, WITH, WITH THE NEIGHBORING DEALERSHIP, UM, WITHOUT A PRIMARY BUILDING THAT'S HOUSING THE BUSINESS.
THE PROPOSED PHASE TWO IS INTENDED TO DEVELOP AS RETAIL AND OR COMMERCIAL USES IN THE FUTURE.
UM, THIS ZONING CASE IS TITLED AS AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO.
THESE, THESE ZONING CASE THAT IS TITLED AS AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO IS SCHEDULED FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 16TH.
THEY JUST KIND OF WENT OUT OF ORDER JUST BASED ON HOW THE REVIEW TIME WENT.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE INTERSECTION OF AUTO PARK DRIVE AND 180 3 TOLL ROAD.
AND IT IS, UM, TO THE SOUTH IS THE HONDA AND THE HYUNDAI DEALERSHIPS PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH AND THE EAST ARE CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED.
THE PROPERTIES TO THE WEST ARE CURRENTLY ZONED FOR A GAS STATION AND A HOME IMPROVEMENT BUSINESS, WHICH ARE QUICKTRIP AND THE HOME DEPOT.
AND THERE HAVE BEEN TWO OTHER CASES, WHICH IS THE ORIGINAL PUT THAT WAS APPROVED IN DECEMBER OF 2018.
AND THEN THE AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO, WHICH IS, UM, SCHEDULED TO BE APPROVED ON THE 16TH OF THIS MONTH.
AND THEN THERE'S ALSO SOME SUBDIVISIONS THAT HAVE, UM, APPLICATIONS THAT HAVE BEEN APPROVED.
THE CONCEPT PLAN AND THE PRELIM PLAT WERE APPROVED ALSO IN 2018 WITH THE PUD AND THE FINAL PLAT IS CURRENTLY UNDER REVIEW.
SO THAT ONE HAS NOT BEEN FINALIZED YET AND THE PROPERTY IS PART OF THAT ORIGINAL, UM, PUD, WHICH INCLUDED A RANGE OF WAIVERS ASSOCIATED WITH THE AUTOMOTIVE, AUTOMOTIVE MOBILE DEALERSHIP ON LOT ONE BLOCK B.
THE ZONING REQUEST DOES NOT CHANGE THOSE PREVIOUS CONTENTS OF THE PUD.
THE REQUEST WOULD ALLOW FOR THE STORAGE OF VEHICLES OF THE AUTOMOTIVE DEALERSHIPS WITHOUT THAT PRIMARY BUILDING.
AND THE PHASE TWO OF THE SITE IS PROPOSED TO BE, UM, RETAIL AND OR COMMERCIAL USES IN THE FUTURE.
THE PROPOSED USES ARE COMPATIBLE WITH THE BAY ZONING DISTRICT OF GC FOUR A AND IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE SURROUNDING LAND USES AS A REGIONAL COMMERCIAL BUSINESS.
STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PUT AMENDMENT AND THE APPLICANT IS AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.
IS THERE AN APPLICANT PRESENTATION? NO.
WE CAN MAKE ONE IF Y'ALL WANT, BUT WE'RE HERE.
IF YOU DON'T NEED TO, IF YOU, IF YOU'RE HERE FOR QUESTIONS, UH, WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS TIME.
IS THERE ANYONE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? OKAY.
SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND, UH, ENTER INTO DISCUSSION.
UH, WE'LL START AGAIN WITH COMMISSIONER MORALES.
UM, HAVE Y'ALL REACHED OUT TO ANY NEIGHBORS ON THIS ONE? THAT'S NORTH, SOUTH.
ARE THERE ANY SETBACKS IF IT'S ALL PARKING? UH, WELL WE HAVE REACHED OUT TO, UH, MY NAME'S PETER CERO.
THE ADDRESS IS, UH, 4 0 1 CONGRESS AVENUE, AUSTIN, TEXAS, AND I REPRESENT PENSKE.
UH, I KNOW WE'VE REACHED OUT TO THE, UH, PENSKE OPERATES THE HONDA AND HYUNDAI DEALERSHIP ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE ROAD, UH, OF AUTO PARK DRIVE, AND THEN ALSO, UH, THE BEASLEY DEALERSHIP AS WELL.
COMMISSIONER LADAY? UM, I'M GOOD TOO.
AND I HAVE NOTHING TO ADD EITHER.
MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER MAY 2ND, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER LANTRIP.
ALL IN FAVOR PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
THE TIME IS SIX 18 AND THE MEETING IS ADJOURNED.