[8. Conduct a Public Hearing and consider action regarding Zoning Case Z-25-0176 to amend the current zoning of Interim SFR-1-B (Single-Family Residential) and Interim SFS-2-B (Single-Family Suburban) to GC-2-C (General Commercial) on three (3) parcels of land 12.595 acres ± in size, more particularly described by Williamson Central Appraisal District Parcels R343706, R343707, and R343708; and generally located southeast of the intersection of 183A Toll Road and E. Woodview Drive, Leander, Williamson County, Texas.

Discuss and consider action regarding Zoning Case Z-25-0176 as described above.

]

THOSE IN FAVOR? OKAY. AND IT PASSES. ALL RIGHT. WE'LL MOVE ON TO OUR PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA.

AND FIRST ITEM IS ITEM NUMBER EIGHT. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ACTION REGARDING ZONING. CASE Z DASH 20 FIVE, DASH 0176 TO AMEND THE CURRENT ZONING OF INTERIM SFR ONE B SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND INTERIM SFS TO BE SINGLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO GC2C GENERAL COMMERCIAL ON THREE PARCELS OF LAND 12.595 ACRES IN SIZE, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED BY WILLIAMSON CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT PARCELS R343706, R343707 AND R343708, AND GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION OF 183 A TOLL AND EAST WOODVIEW DRIVE.

LEANDER, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. HOPE YOU'RE ALL DOING WELL. SO THIS REQUEST IS THE FIRST STEP IN THE ZONING PROCESS. THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE DESIGNATED ZONING DISTRICT OF THEIR PROPERTY IN ORDER TO DEVELOP THE LOT IN A COMMERCIAL MANNER. LOT TWO AND THREE WILL BE DEVELOPED AS A PEAK PERFORMANCE MARTIAL ARTS TRAINING CENTER, WHILE LOT FOUR WILL BE CONSIDERED FOR FUTURE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT. THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE DOES COMPLY WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION OF MULTI-USE CORRIDOR ON A PRIORITY CORRIDOR, AND WOULD BE APPROPRIATE AND COMPLEMENTARY TO THE EXISTING AND SURROUNDING USES. THE CURRENT ZONING. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SCREEN, SFR INTERIM, SFR ONE B AND INTERIM SFS TWO B SLIGHT EDIT TO THE STAFF REPORT THERE. THE PROPOSED ZONING IS GC TWO C. LET'S SEE. SO WE'LL GET AN AERIAL HERE. TO KIND OF SET THE STAGE FOR YOU. THE PROPERTIES ARE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST INTERSECTION OF 183 A TOLL ROAD AND WOODVIEW DRIVE. THE SURROUNDING USES INCLUDE THE LIFE CHURCH TO THE NORTH, THE FUTURE ENCLAVE AT STEWART CROSSING TOWNHOMES TO THE EAST, AND THE PARK AT CRYSTAL FALLS APARTMENTS TO THE SOUTH. LET'S SEE, IN ADDITION TO THE NOTICE THAT STAFF MAILED ON BEHALF OF THE CITY TO THE PROPERTY OWNERS THAT FELL WITHIN 200FT, THE AGENT IS REQUIRED TO REACH OUT TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS OF PROPERTY ZONED AS SINGLE FAMILY, OR ANY PROPERTIES USED AS SINGLE FAMILY WITHIN 500FT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. ANY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION THAT WERE LOCATED WITHIN THE 500 FOOT BUFFER ARE ALSO REQUIRED TO BE CONTACTED. THERE IS A NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH IN YOUR PACKET. IT'S EXHIBIT SEVEN. IT INCLUDED THE NATURE NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH FORM THAT THEY SENT OUT TO THE RESIDENTS. AND THEN THERE WAS ALSO COMMUNICATION WITH THE ONE OF THE HOA'S, PER THE APPLICANT, THE STEWART CROSSING SUBDIVISION, HOA ENCLAVE AT STEWART CROSSING AND PARK AT CRYSTAL FALLS APARTMENTS WERE ALL NOTIFIED. NO SPECIFIC ZONING RELATED CONCERNS WERE FIELDED TO REVISE THE ZONING REQUEST. AGAIN, THAT FULL REPORT IS EXHIBIT SEVEN IN YOUR HANDOUT TONIGHT. REPRESENTING THE PROJECT WILL BE SANDLIN SERVICES. THERE'S ALSO THE PROPERTY OWNERS ARE HERE AS WELL TO ANSWER ANY OF YOUR QUESTIONS. I BELIEVE THEY HAVE A SHORT POWERPOINT AFTER STAFF'S PRESENTATION. SO THE CONCLUSION IS AS PART OF THE EVALUATION OF THIS REQUEST, THE

[00:05:03]

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION HAS THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS. OPTION ONE TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE REQUEST AS IS. OPTION TWO DENY THE PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE REQUEST, OR OPTION THREE TO APPROVE AN ALTERNATIVE REQUEST THAT MAY INCLUDE A MORE RESTRICTIVE SITE COMPONENT, TYPE ONE OR TYPE TWO, OR A MORE RESTRICTIVE ARCHITECTURAL COMPONENT. TYPE A OR TYPE B STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF THE OPTION ONE THAT WE'VE LISTED. THE REQUEST IS BASED ON THE SURROUNDING COMMERCIAL USES AND THE FUTURE LAND USE. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION. AS PER THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, STAFF IS HERE FOR ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS COMMENTS YOU MAY HAVE. AGAIN, THE OWNER IS HERE TO PRESENT A POWERPOINT TO YOU. SO THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. AND JUST TO CLARIFY, THEY ARE REQUESTING A TYPE TWO SITE COMPONENT ALREADY. SO TYPE ONE WOULD ONLY BE THE NEXT OPTION UP IF WE WANTED TO SEEK AN ALTERNATIVE. ALL RIGHT. YEAH. APPLICANT PRESENTATION. THERE YOU GO. GOOD EVENING.

DISTINGUISHED COUNCIL MEMBERS. HOW ARE YOU GUYS THIS EVENING. DOING WELL. MY NAME IS GARY SHILL. MY WIFE AND I, PAULA. WE OWN PEAK PERFORMANCE TRAINING CENTER. WE'VE BEEN LOCATED IN CEDAR PARK SINCE 1997. WE HAVE 9000 SQUARE FOOT LOCATION RIGHT NOW AND WE ARE IN THE PROCESS OF PURCHASING. WE'VE ALREADY PURCHASED, I SHOULDN'T SAY PROCESS. WE'VE PURCHASED THE LAND ALREADY IN THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING THE LAND TO GIVE US A SYNERGISTIC FEEL FOR KIDS AND FAMILIES INSIDE OF THAT. I'VE BEEN DOING MARTIAL ARTS FOR 52 YEARS. I'VE OWNED AND OPERATED SCHOOLS SINCE 1989, AND OUR SCHOOL IS IN THE TOP 1% OF ALL MARTIAL ARTS SCHOOLS IN THE COUNTRY. I ALSO DO A LOT OF. COUNSELING FOR THE MARTIAL ARTS SCHOOLS TO HELP THEM RUN EFFICIENT MARTIAL ARTS SCHOOLS AND DEVELOP THEM WHERE THEY NEED TO BE AT. THE PROGRAMS THAT WE OFFER ARE MARTIAL ARTS LESSONS FOR KIDS THAT ARE THREE AND UP ALL THE WAY TO YOUNG KIDS IN THEIR 80S, AND THEN I'VE GOT AFTER SCHOOL PROGRAMS WE PICK UP FROM 40 SCHOOLS IN THE AREA BETWEEN LEANDER, ROUND ROCK, LIBERTY HILL AND THE CHARTER SCHOOLS THAT ARE IN THE AREA AS WELL. AND OF COURSE, WE RUN LARGE SUMMER CAMP PROGRAMS FOR KIDS KINDERGARTEN UP THROUGH 11TH GRADE. THE FUTURE IS IS WE WANT TO BUILD A NEW 23,000 SQUARE FOOT FACILITY. WE HAVE CHOSEN LEANDER FOR SEVERAL REASONS. ONE, WE KNOW THAT THE GROWTH IN THE AREA IS GOING THAT WAY. WE KNOW THAT WE CAN IMPACT MORE LIVES BECAUSE OF THE GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF LEANDER WHERE IT'S AT, AND IT PROVIDES US A LOT MORE SPACE TO BE ABLE TO IMPACT MORE CHILDREN'S LIVES, ESPECIALLY POST COVID. A LOT OF THEM ARE IN A VERY DIFFERENT SPOT WITH THEIR CONFIDENCE OR SELF-ESTEEM AND THE PHYSICALITY OF THINGS FOR CHILDREN AND FOR FAMILIES AS WELL. SO THAT'S OUR GOAL AND THAT'S WHAT WE WANT TO ACCOMPLISH WITH THAT. IT'S BEEN MY LIFELONG MISSION AND WHAT I'VE BEEN DOING FOR NOW FOR A VERY LONG TIME. THIS IS MY INSTRUCTIONAL TEAM. THESE ARE ALL FULL TIME STAFF MEMBERS. MY INSTRUCTORS GO THROUGH 1000 HOUR CERTIFICATION PROCESS. THEY DO 3 TO 5 HOURS OF CONTINUING EDUCATION EVERY WEEK ON CHILD AND FAMILY DEVELOPMENT. JUST BECAUSE, AGAIN, THESE CHILDREN ARE VERY, VERY DIFFERENT THAN THEY WERE PRE COVID. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE SERVING ALL THEIR NEEDS MENTALLY, EMOTIONALLY, PHYSICALLY, SOCIALLY AS WELL. YOU KNOW, ABOUT THE LOCATION WHERE WE'RE GOING TO BE LOCATED AT. THERE'S A TOTAL OF 12 ACRE, 12 PLUS ACRES THAT ARE THERE.

AND OUR DEVELOPMENT WANTS TO BE VERY FAMILY AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTRIC. EVERYTHING FROM WHERE WE'RE AT TO CHILD DENTISTRY, CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST, WE WANT TO HAVE IT MORE OF A FAMILY TYPE SETUP IN THAT FIELD, AND I'LL BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU GUYS HAVE ABOUT THAT. YOU GUYS KNOW ABOUT THE CITY MAPS A LOT MORE THAN I DO, AND MY TEAM DOES AS WELL. BUT THIS IS WHERE THE INITIAL PLANNING SETUP LOOKS LIKE WILL BE IN THE BACK. AND THEN WE'LL HAVE THE DIFFERENT BUILDINGS THAT WILL BE THERE IN THE FRONT AND TO THE SIDE OF US AS WELL.

DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT US, THE THE DEVELOPMENT, WHAT OUR FUTURE GOALS ARE FOR THIS PROJECT? YEAH, WE MIGHT HAVE SOME QUESTIONS AFTER WE AFTER WE GO THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING. NO PROBLEM. YEAH. BUT WE MAY CALL YOU BACK UP WHEN WE GO TO DISCUSSION. OKAY. YES, SIR. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME. I APPRECIATE YOU GUYS. THANK YOU.

OKAY. WITH THAT, WE WILL OPEN UP THE PUBLIC HEARING. IS ANYBODY WISHING TO SPEAK ON THIS AGENDA ITEM TONIGHT? OKAY. THEN WE WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND ENTER INTO DISCUSSION. I'LL START TO MY RIGHT, COMMISSIONER MEHAN. I DON'T HAVE ANY ISSUES. I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION. ARE THE SURROUNDING COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES THAT WE HAVE ALONG? 183 A THE 183 A SERVICE ROAD? ARE THOSE THOSE GENERALLY IN THE TO SEE YOU KNOW, GC TO SEE

[00:10:05]

SPACE. OR LESS RESTRICTIVE EVEN I JUST WE HAVE A GOOD MIX. SO IN THIS AREA THERE'S A LOT OF INTERIM RESIDENTIAL EXISTING. BUT AS WE REZONE NEW PROPERTIES WE MAKE SURE WE CONSIDER ARE THEY DOING A GAS STATION OR NOT. AND THE TYPE TWO AND THREE IS HOW YOU DIFFERENTIATE THAT. SO WE REQUESTED THE TYPE TWO BECAUSE THEY WEREN'T LOOKING FOR A GAS STATION. EXACTLY. SO I JUST I ONLY BROUGHT THAT UP TO MENTION THAT, YOU KNOW, THE OPTION NUMBER THREE FOR ME IS REALLY OFF THE BOARD. WE WOULDN'T WE WOULDN'T WANT TO MAKE IT MORE RESTRICTIVE ON THESE GUYS THAN WE'VE ALREADY DONE. SO I'VE GOT NO PROBLEMS WITH THIS AND IT'S THE APPROPRIATE ZONING FOR THE SPACE. SO THANK YOU. SOUNDS GOOD, COMMISSIONER MORALES.

YEAH I THINK OVERALL, YOU KNOW, BEING NEXT TO THE HIGHWAY, YOU KNOW, YOU GOT A HIGH SCHOOL.

THE YOUTH SEEM VERY APPROPRIATE. DEFINITELY DOESN'T SEEM APPROPRIATE TO HAVE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES NEXT TO THE HIGHWAY. BUT SO I DO THINK THE ZONING IS SEEMS LIKE A REASONABLE REQUEST. THE ONLY THING GOING FROM B TO C ON THE ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, IT IS A HIGHLY VISIBLE LOCATION BEING ON THE SIDE OF THE HIGHWAY, BUT THAT WOULD BE MY ONLY RECOMMENDATION TO KEEP IT. B BUT OVERALL, I DO THINK THAT IT'S STILL IS A GREAT. ALL RIGHT, COMMISSIONER LEWIS, I AGREE WITH EVERYBODY ELSE. I THINK IT'S A GREAT USE FOR THE THE LAND AND THE AREA, AND I THINK IT'LL DO NOTHING BUT BENEFIT EVERYBODY THAT CAN PARTICIPATE THERE. ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER LANTRIP, I'M FINE WITH GC TWO C ON THIS. AND I THINK IT LOOKS LIKE A GOOD PROJECT. SO GOOD VICE CHAIR. NO ISSUES AT ALL. ON A PERSONAL NOTE, I LOVE YOUR BUSINESS MODEL. SINGLE MOST INFLUENTIAL THING WHEN I WAS A KID. SO DOING GOOD WORK. YEAH, AND I'M GOOD ON THIS TOO. I JUST WANT TO CALL OUT THANKS FOR, YOU KNOW, ALSO ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS AND PROVIDING THOSE. I THINK THOSE WERE ALSO INSIGHTFUL AS FAR AS THE QUESTIONS THAT WERE ASKED BY THE HOA AND THEN THE RESPONSES YOU GAVE. SO THAT WAS REALLY HELPFUL TOO. I DON'T HAVE ANY CONCERNS THIS AS WELL, I THINK.

I THINK GC TWO C IS APPROPRIATE AS WELL. SO DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE? MOTION TO APPROVE OKAY. MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER. SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER MEHAN. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. AND IT PASSES. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. WE'RE MOVING ON TO OUR REGULAR

[9. Discuss and consider action on Tree Removal Case TRP-25-0040 regarding the removal of twelve (12) Significant Trees associated with the commercial development of 675 Kauffman Loop Public Improvement Construction Plans (PICP-24-0176) and Site Development (SD-24-0282) projects located at 675 Kauffman Loop, Leander, Williamson County, Texas.]

AGENDA. WE WILL DISCUSS AND CONSIDER ACTION ON TREE REMOVAL CASE TRP DASH 250040 REGARDING THE REMOVAL OF 12 SIGNIFICANT TREES ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT OF 675 COFFMAN LOOP PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS LOCATED AT 675 COFFMAN LOOP, LEANDER, WILLIAMSON COUNTY, TEXAS. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS KAYLA WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND I'M HERE TO DISCUSS THE TREE REMOVAL CASE FOR THE PROPOSED REMOVAL OF 12 SIGNIFICANT TREES LOCATED AT 675 COFFMAN LOOP. THIS PROJECT INCLUDES BOTH COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES, BUT TODAY WE'RE GOING TO DISCUSS THE REMOVAL OF THE COMMERCIAL PORTION. 675 COFFMAN LOOP IS ZONED AS A PUD WITH A BASE ZONING OF A GC2, A IN THE FRONT, AND A SF TWO IN THE REAR, AND THAT IS A GENERAL COMMERCIAL AND A SINGLE FAMILY TOWNHOUSE. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED JUST SOUTH OF STATE HIGHWAY 29, APPROXIMATELY 500FT EAST OF RONALD REAGAN, AND INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 25.78 ACRES.

NORTH OF THE PROPERTY IS. COMMERCIAL USES CURRENTLY UNDER DEVELOP TO THE EAST IS UNDEVELOPED, RESIDENTIAL TO THE SOUTH IS CURRENTLY UNDEVELOPED, AND TO THE WEST IS COMMERCIAL USES UNDER THE RW COMMERCIAL PUD, AND THERE IS NO FLOODPLAIN ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROJECT.

THE ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE SIX, SECTION ONE C INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING TREE MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT UP ON THE SCREEN, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO REMOVE 12 SIGNIFICANT TREES EXCEEDING 18 INCH CALIPER, BUT NOT EXCEEDING 26 INCH CALIBER.

THESE TREES ARE DIRECTLY IMPACTED BY INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS, I.E. WATER LINE CONSTRUCTION, PUBLIC SIDEWALKS, SHARED ACCESS, DRIVEWAY AND DETENTION POND. THE APPLICANT MITIGATION PROPOSAL FOR THE COMMERCIAL SIDE OF THE PROJECT INCLUDES THE REMOVAL OF TREES SIZED 8 TO 18IN, TOTALING AT 167.5 CALIPER INCHES, OR APPROXIMATELY 8% OF THE TOTAL TREE COVERAGE. THE REMOVAL OF TREE SIZE 18 TO 26 CALIPER INCHES, TOTALING AT 272.25IN, OR APPROXIMATELY 13% OF THE TOTAL TREE COVERAGE, AND THIS IS SHOWN THROUGH THE PICP AND THE SITE DEVELOPMENT. SO THERE'S TWO TREES IN THE PICP SHOWN ON THE SCREEN. AND THEN THERE ARE TEN TREES IN THE SITE. DEVELOPMENT ALSO SHOWN ON THE TREE SCREEN. THERE ARE NO HERITAGE TREES BEING REMOVED FOR THIS PERMIT, AND THE APPLICANT IS PRESERVING

[00:15:04]

APPROXIMATELY 78% OF THE REMAINING TREES ON SITE. BECAUSE THE PROPOSAL IS UNDER THE 50% LIMIT FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE 8 TO 18 INCH TREES, THERE'S NO MITIGATION REQUIREMENT FOR THE SPECIFIC TREES, BUT WE'RE DISCUSSING THE REMOVAL OF THE 18 TO 26 TREES, AND WE, THE APPLICANT, HAS OPTED TO GO IN A FEE IN LIEU OF ROUTE. THE FEE IN LIEU OF WILL NEED TO BE REQUIRED TO BE PAID UNDER THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. TO HAVE THE SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT BE ISSUED. THE APPLICANT IS PRESENT TODAY FOR ANY QUESTIONS AND WILL BE AVAILABLE, AND I WILL BE AVAILABLE AS WELL FOR ANY QUESTIONS SHOULD THEY ARISE.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. OKAY. WITH THE APPLICANT, LIKE TO COME UP AND SPEAK OR JUST BE AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. IT'S YOUR CALL. ALRIGHT. SOUNDS GOOD. ALL RIGHT. WITH THAT WE'LL ENTER INTO THE DISCUSSION. I'LL START TO MY LEFT. VICE CHAIR. NO QUESTIONS. THANKS, COMMISSIONER. THE ONLY QUESTION I HAD WAS FOR THE APPLICANT. I NOTICED THAT TWO OF THE 25 INCH LIVE OAKS ARE IN THE DETENTION POND AREA. ANY WAY THAT CAN BE RECONFIGURED AT ALL. OR IS THAT.

THE ONE OF THE. IF YOU CAN COME UP TO THE FRONT, SIR, AND THEN JUST YOU CAN SPEAK TO THE MIC.

YEAH. SO ONE OF THE TREES THAT ARE IN THAT DETENTION POND ACTUALLY IS MORE THAN LIKELY GOING TO BE DEEMED AS FAILING FROM THE ARBORIST. WE ARE OKAY LATE ON THE BRINGING IN THE ARBORIST ORDERS REPORT, BUT IT IS CLEARLY FAILING. AS SCOTT BARKED IT'S STRIPPED AND THINGS LIKE THAT. SO IT'S IT'S GOT A HOLLOW PIECE TO IT AS WELL. SO THAT'S THE ONE. BUT AS FAR AS THE WAY THE PROPERTY IS LAID OUT, IT'S, IT'S THERE'S NOT A WAY TO CHANGE THE DETENTION POND AS IT SITS. RIGHT. THANK YOU. YEAH. OKAY. COMMISSIONER LEWIS, NO QUESTIONS. ALL RIGHT, COMMISSIONER MORALES. YEAH. YOU KNOW, YOU TRY TO SAVE AS MANY AS YOU COULD. I GUESS IT LOOKS LIKE. AND LOOKING LIKE. IT STILL LOOKS LIKE THERE'S A DECENT AMOUNT OF TREES AROUND THE TRIBES AND OTHER THINGS BEING IN PLACE. SO I DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER ISSUES. COMMISSIONER MEHAN. I'M GOOD. ALL RIGHT. YEAH. AND AS FOR MYSELF, I MEAN, COMMISSIONER LANTRIP ASKED A QUESTION I ASKED WAS THINKING ABOUT AS FAR AS DETENTION POND, BUT OTHERWISE I'M GOOD ON THIS ONE AS WELL. THIS IS AN ACTION ITEM. SO DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE? MOTION TO APPROVE? I HAVE A SECOND. I'LL SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER LEWIS, SECONDED BY THE VICE CHAIR. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? OKAY. AND IT PASSES. ALL RIGHT. WITH

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.